From d6570f8577a955a6950ef9fe1ee9def401759336 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Vogt Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 16:23:14 +0200 Subject: Notice the user about "apt list -a" when only a single hit if found If the user is using "apt list pattern" and there is only a single hit, notice about "--all-versions" as this is what the user may be interessted in --- apt-private/private-list.cc | 15 ++++++++++++++- test/integration/test-apt-cli-list | 12 ++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/apt-private/private-list.cc b/apt-private/private-list.cc index b053cbcbe..b69002103 100644 --- a/apt-private/private-list.cc +++ b/apt-private/private-list.cc @@ -130,10 +130,11 @@ bool DoList(CommandLine &Cmd) Cache->Head().PackageCount, _("Listing")); GetLocalitySortedVersionSet(CacheFile, bag, matcher, progress); + bool ShowAllVersions = _config->FindB("APT::Cmd::All-Versions", false); for (LocalitySortedVersionSet::iterator V = bag.begin(); V != bag.end(); ++V) { std::stringstream outs; - if(_config->FindB("APT::Cmd::All-Versions", false) == true) + if(ShowAllVersions == true) { ListAllVersions(CacheFile, records, V.ParentPkg(), outs, includeSummary); output_map.insert(std::make_pair( @@ -151,6 +152,18 @@ bool DoList(CommandLine &Cmd) std::cout << (*K).second << std::endl; + // be nice and tell the user if there is more to see + if (bag.size() == 1 && ShowAllVersions == false) + { + // start with -1 as we already displayed one version + int versions = -1; + pkgCache::VerIterator Ver = *bag.begin(); + for ( ; Ver.end() == false; Ver++) + versions++; + if (versions > 0) + _error->Notice(P_("There is %i additional version. Please use the '-a' switch to see it", "There are %i additional versions. Please use the '-a' switch to see them.", versions), versions); + } + return true; } diff --git a/test/integration/test-apt-cli-list b/test/integration/test-apt-cli-list index 47cfb624a..b738bcc66 100755 --- a/test/integration/test-apt-cli-list +++ b/test/integration/test-apt-cli-list @@ -19,12 +19,17 @@ insertinstalledpackage 'bar' 'i386' '1.0' insertinstalledpackage 'foobar' 'i386' '1.0' insertpackage 'unstable' 'foobar' 'i386' '2.0' +insertinstalledpackage 'baz' 'all' '0.1' +insertpackage 'testing' 'baz' 'all' '1.0' +insertpackage 'unstable' 'baz' 'all' '2.0' + setupaptarchive APTARCHIVE=$(readlink -f ./aptarchive) testequal "Listing... bar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,local] +baz/unstable 2.0 all [upgradable from: 0.1] foo/unstable 1.0 all foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]" apt list @@ -33,12 +38,14 @@ foo/unstable 1.0 all foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]" apt list "foo*" testequal "Listing... +baz/unstable 2.0 all [upgradable from: 0.1] foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]" apt list --upgradable # FIXME: hm, hm - does it make sense to have this different? shouldn't # we use "installed,upgradable" consitently? testequal "Listing... bar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,local] +baz/now 0.1 all [installed,upgradable to: 2.0] foobar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0]" apt list --installed testequal "Listing... @@ -51,3 +58,8 @@ bar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,local] an autogenerated dummy bar=1.0/installed " apt list bar --verbose +# ensure that the users learns about multiple versions too +testequal "Listing... +baz/unstable 2.0 all [upgradable from: 0.1] +N: There are 2 additional versions. Please use the '-a' switch to see them." apt list baz -o quiet=0 + -- cgit v1.2.3