From cd67c02330b0c2f47ab4c7c2c1cbc883dacfc453 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Kalnischkies Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 18:23:25 +0100 Subject: fix minimum pkgs option for dpkg --recursive usage MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Interpreting a boolean as an int works just fine – it just hasn't the intended result – it isn't a serious problem through as the disabling of the usage of this dpkg calling style is just an "optimization" (cherry picked from commit 4e18c2cee6da39982cc463cafbf27eab5561099f) --- apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'apt-pkg/deb') diff --git a/apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc b/apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc index 2e779ca8b..d748f13b7 100644 --- a/apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc +++ b/apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ bool pkgDPkgPM::Go(APT::Progress::PackageManager *progress) dpkg_recursive_install = Cache.VS().CmpVersion("1.18.5", dpkgpkg.CurrentVer().VerStr()) <= 0; } // no point in doing this dance for a handful of packages only - unsigned int const dpkg_recursive_install_min = _config->FindB("dpkg::install::recursive::minimum", 5); + unsigned int const dpkg_recursive_install_min = _config->FindI("dpkg::install::recursive::minimum", 5); // FIXME: workaround for dpkg bug, see our ./test-bug-740843-versioned-up-down-breaks test bool const dpkg_recursive_install_numbered = _config->FindB("dpkg::install::recursive::numbered", true); -- cgit v1.2.3