From 2de7157775551185beb3d7cb56e9f9f353e57ab4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Kalnischkies Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 00:05:14 +0200 Subject: rewrite pkgOrderList::DepRemove to stop incorrect immediate setting MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Some squeeze → wheezy upgrades indicate that DepRemove runs amok in complicated setups as it wasn't correctly working with or-groups. Completely rewritten the check is now moving from or-group to or-group instead. The behavior should be the same as the code before, but (hopefully) with less bugs and more comments. Closes: 645713 --- apt-pkg/orderlist.cc | 219 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-) (limited to 'apt-pkg/orderlist.cc') diff --git a/apt-pkg/orderlist.cc b/apt-pkg/orderlist.cc index 80d8fd490..86d2a9478 100644 --- a/apt-pkg/orderlist.cc +++ b/apt-pkg/orderlist.cc @@ -893,149 +893,136 @@ bool pkgOrderList::DepConfigure(DepIterator D) /*}}}*/ // OrderList::DepRemove - Removal ordering /*{{{*/ // --------------------------------------------------------------------- -/* Removal visits all reverse depends. It considers if the dependency - of the Now state version to see if it is okay with removing this - package. This check should always fail, but is provided for symetery - with the other critical handlers. - - Loops are preprocessed and logged. Removal loops can also be - detected in the critical handler. They are characterized by an - old version of A depending on B but the new version of A conflicting - with B, thus either A or B must break to install. */ -bool pkgOrderList::DepRemove(DepIterator D) +/* Checks all given dependencies if they are broken by the remove of a + package and if so fix it by visiting another provider or or-group + member to ensure that the dependee keeps working which is especially + important for Immediate packages like e.g. those depending on an + awk implementation. If the dependency can't be fixed with another + package this means an upgrade of the package will solve the problem. */ +bool pkgOrderList::DepRemove(DepIterator Broken) { - if (D.Reverse() == false) + if (Broken.Reverse() == false) return true; - for (; D.end() == false; ++D) - if (D->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Depends || D->Type == pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) + + for (; Broken.end() == false; ++Broken) + { + if (Broken->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Depends && + Broken->Type != pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) + continue; + + PkgIterator BrokenPkg = Broken.ParentPkg(); + // uninstalled packages can't break via a remove + if (BrokenPkg->CurrentVer == 0) + continue; + + // if its already added, we can't do anything useful + if (IsFlag(BrokenPkg, AddPending) == true || IsFlag(BrokenPkg, Added) == true) + continue; + + // if the dependee is going to be removed, visit it now + if (Cache[BrokenPkg].Delete() == true) + return VisitNode(BrokenPkg, "Remove-Dependee"); + + // The package stays around, so find out how this is possible + for (DepIterator D = BrokenPkg.CurrentVer().DependsList(); D.end() == false;) { - // Duplication elimination, consider the current version only - if (D.ParentPkg().CurrentVer() != D.ParentVer()) + // only important or-groups need fixing + if (D->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Depends && + D->Type != pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) + { + ++D; continue; + } - /* We wish to see if the dep on the parent package is okay - in the removed (install) state of the target pkg. */ - bool tryFixDeps = false; - if (CheckDep(D) == true) + // Start is the beginning of the or-group, D is the first one after or + DepIterator Start = D; + bool foundBroken = false; + for (bool LastOR = true; D.end() == false && LastOR == true; ++D) { - // We want to catch loops with the code below. - if (IsFlag(D.ParentPkg(),AddPending) == false) - continue; + LastOR = (D->CompareOp & pkgCache::Dep::Or) == pkgCache::Dep::Or; + if (D == Broken) + foundBroken = true; } - else - tryFixDeps = true; - // This is the loop detection - if (IsFlag(D.ParentPkg(),Added) == true || - IsFlag(D.ParentPkg(),AddPending) == true) - { - if (IsFlag(D.ParentPkg(),AddPending) == true) - AddLoop(D); + // this or-group isn't the broken one: keep searching + if (foundBroken == false) continue; + + // iterate over all members of the or-group searching for a ready replacement + bool readyReplacement = false; + for (DepIterator OrMember = Start; OrMember != D && readyReplacement == false; ++OrMember) + { + Version ** Replacements = OrMember.AllTargets(); + for (Version **R = Replacements; *R != 0; ++R) + { + VerIterator Ver(Cache,*R); + // only currently installed packages can be a replacement + PkgIterator RPkg = Ver.ParentPkg(); + if (RPkg.CurrentVer() != Ver) + continue; + + // packages going to be removed can't be a replacement + if (Cache[RPkg].Delete() == true) + continue; + + readyReplacement = true; + break; + } + delete[] Replacements; } - if (tryFixDeps == true) + // something else is ready to take over, do nothing + if (readyReplacement == true) + continue; + + // see if we can visit a replacement + bool visitReplacement = false; + for (DepIterator OrMember = Start; OrMember != D && visitReplacement == false; ++OrMember) { - for (pkgCache::DepIterator F = D.ParentPkg().CurrentVer().DependsList(); - F.end() == false; ++F) + Version ** Replacements = OrMember.AllTargets(); + for (Version **R = Replacements; *R != 0; ++R) { - if (F->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Depends && F->Type != pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) + VerIterator Ver(Cache,*R); + // consider only versions we plan to install + PkgIterator RPkg = Ver.ParentPkg(); + if (Cache[RPkg].Install() == false || Cache[RPkg].InstallVer != Ver) continue; - // Check the Providers - if (F.TargetPkg()->ProvidesList != 0) - { - pkgCache::PrvIterator Prov = F.TargetPkg().ProvidesList(); - for (; Prov.end() == false; ++Prov) - { - pkgCache::PkgIterator const P = Prov.OwnerPkg(); - if (IsFlag(P, InList) == true && - IsFlag(P, AddPending) == true && - IsFlag(P, Added) == false && - Cache[P].InstallVer == 0) - break; - } - if (Prov.end() == false) - for (pkgCache::PrvIterator Prv = F.TargetPkg().ProvidesList(); - Prv.end() == false; ++Prv) - { - pkgCache::PkgIterator const P = Prv.OwnerPkg(); - if (IsFlag(P, InList) == true && - IsFlag(P, AddPending) == false && - Cache[P].InstallVer != 0 && - VisitNode(P, "Remove-P") == true) - { - Flag(P, Immediate); - tryFixDeps = false; - break; - } - } - if (tryFixDeps == false) - break; - } - // Check for Or groups - if ((F->CompareOp & pkgCache::Dep::Or) != pkgCache::Dep::Or) + // loops are not going to help us, so don't create them + if (IsFlag(RPkg, AddPending) == true) continue; - // Lets see if the package is part of the Or group - pkgCache::DepIterator S = F; - for (; S.end() == false; ++S) + + if (IsMissing(RPkg) == true) + continue; + + visitReplacement = true; + if (IsFlag(BrokenPkg, Immediate) == false) { - if (S.TargetPkg() == D.TargetPkg()) + if (VisitNode(RPkg, "Remove-Rep") == true) break; - if ((S->CompareOp & pkgCache::Dep::Or) != pkgCache::Dep::Or || - CheckDep(S)) // Or group is satisfied by another package - for (;S.end() == false; ++S); } - if (S.end() == true) - continue; - // skip to the end of the or group - for (;S.end() == false && (S->CompareOp & pkgCache::Dep::Or) == pkgCache::Dep::Or; ++S); - ++S; - // The soon to be removed is part of the Or group - // start again in the or group and find something which will serve as replacement - for (; F.end() == false && F != S; ++F) + else { - if (IsFlag(F.TargetPkg(), InList) == true && - IsFlag(F.TargetPkg(), AddPending) == false && - Cache[F.TargetPkg()].InstallVer != 0 && - VisitNode(F.TargetPkg(), "Remove-Target") == true) - { - Flag(F.TargetPkg(), Immediate); - tryFixDeps = false; + Flag(RPkg, Immediate); + if (VisitNode(RPkg, "Remove-ImmRep") == true) break; - } - else if (F.TargetPkg()->ProvidesList != 0) - { - pkgCache::PrvIterator Prv = F.TargetPkg().ProvidesList(); - for (; Prv.end() == false; ++Prv) - { - if (IsFlag(Prv.OwnerPkg(), InList) == true && - IsFlag(Prv.OwnerPkg(), AddPending) == false && - Cache[Prv.OwnerPkg()].InstallVer != 0 && - VisitNode(Prv.OwnerPkg(), "Remove-Owner") == true) - { - Flag(Prv.OwnerPkg(), Immediate); - tryFixDeps = false; - break; - } - } - if (Prv.end() == false) - break; - } } - if (tryFixDeps == false) - break; + visitReplacement = false; } + delete[] Replacements; } - - // Skip over missing files - if (IsMissing(D.ParentPkg()) == true) + if (visitReplacement == true) continue; - - if (VisitNode(D.ParentPkg(), "Remove-Parent") == false) + + // the broken package in current version can't be fixed, so install new version + if (IsMissing(BrokenPkg) == true) + break; + + if (VisitNode(BrokenPkg, "Remove-Upgrade") == false) return false; } - + } + return true; } /*}}}*/ -- cgit v1.2.3 From 978844db25deb7cd88b053bc2f4685caf2c61a75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Kalnischkies Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 17:10:21 +0200 Subject: prefer Essentials over Removals in ordering score Doing Removes early is good to have them out of the way, so they don't break 'Inst' or 'Conf' chains, but scoring them above Essentials means that we end up upgrading (many) less important packages before we handle big stuff like libc6 or debconf which not only fails if those less important packages have unannounced (strict) dependencies, but also leads to having these packages unconfigured for a long time triggering bugs in maintainer scripts for no good reason (#708831). So this commits sets the default value for remove scores to 100, which is below the one for essentials (200) and a lot lower than the previous default value (500). --- apt-pkg/orderlist.cc | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'apt-pkg/orderlist.cc') diff --git a/apt-pkg/orderlist.cc b/apt-pkg/orderlist.cc index 86d2a9478..984ae1d10 100644 --- a/apt-pkg/orderlist.cc +++ b/apt-pkg/orderlist.cc @@ -301,9 +301,8 @@ bool pkgOrderList::OrderConfigure() /* Higher scores order earlier */ int pkgOrderList::Score(PkgIterator Pkg) { - static int const ScoreDelete = _config->FindI("OrderList::Score::Delete", 500); - - // Removal is always done first + // Removals should be done after we dealt with essentials + static int const ScoreDelete = _config->FindI("OrderList::Score::Delete", 100); if (Cache[Pkg].Delete() == true) return ScoreDelete; -- cgit v1.2.3