From 1bef0dd58a281ca2f2900a48459d2c87b4ba8bba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:25:02 +0100
Subject: add integration test for apt search

---
 test/integration/test-apt-cli-list | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 test/integration/test-apt-cli-list

(limited to 'test/integration/test-apt-cli-list')

diff --git a/test/integration/test-apt-cli-list b/test/integration/test-apt-cli-list
new file mode 100755
index 000000000..8d5df9051
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/integration/test-apt-cli-list
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+set -e
+
+TESTDIR=$(readlink -f $(dirname $0))
+. $TESTDIR/framework
+
+setupenvironment
+configarchitecture "i386"
+
+insertpackage 'unstable' 'foo' 'all' '1.0'
+insertinstalledpackage 'bar' 'i386' '1.0'
+
+insertinstalledpackage 'foobar' 'i386' '1.0'
+insertpackage 'unstable' 'foobar' 'i386' '2.0'
+
+setupaptarchive
+
+APTARCHIVE=$(readlink -f ./aptarchive)
+
+testequal "Listing...
+bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386
+foo/unstable 1.0 all
+foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list
+
+testequal "Listing...
+foo/unstable 1.0 all
+foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list "foo*"
+
+testequal "Listing...
+foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list --upgradable
+
+# FIXME: hm, hm - does it make sense to have this different? shouldn't
+#        we use "installed,upgradable" consitently?
+testequal "Listing...
+bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386
+foobar/now 1.0 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0] i386" apt list --installed
+
+testequal "Listing...
+foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386
+foobar/now 1.0 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0] i386
+" apt list foobar --all-versions
+
+testequal "Listing...
+bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386
+  an autogenerated dummy bar=1.0/installed
+" apt list bar --verbose
+
-- 
cgit v1.2.3