From 4afa7d18b37661996d188959ba7917824e1545d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Vogt Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:57:34 +0100 Subject: show "status" in apt list last --- test/integration/test-apt-cli-list | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'test') diff --git a/test/integration/test-apt-cli-list b/test/integration/test-apt-cli-list index 8d5df9051..47507aeb8 100755 --- a/test/integration/test-apt-cli-list +++ b/test/integration/test-apt-cli-list @@ -18,30 +18,30 @@ setupaptarchive APTARCHIVE=$(readlink -f ./aptarchive) testequal "Listing... -bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386 +bar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,local] foo/unstable 1.0 all -foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list +foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]" apt list testequal "Listing... foo/unstable 1.0 all -foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list "foo*" +foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]" apt list "foo*" testequal "Listing... -foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386" apt list --upgradable +foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0]" apt list --upgradable # FIXME: hm, hm - does it make sense to have this different? shouldn't # we use "installed,upgradable" consitently? testequal "Listing... -bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386 -foobar/now 1.0 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0] i386" apt list --installed +bar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,local] +foobar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0]" apt list --installed testequal "Listing... -foobar/unstable 2.0 [upgradable from: 1.0] i386 -foobar/now 1.0 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0] i386 +foobar/unstable 2.0 i386 [upgradable from: 1.0] +foobar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,upgradable to: 2.0] " apt list foobar --all-versions testequal "Listing... -bar/now 1.0 [installed,local] i386 +bar/now 1.0 i386 [installed,local] an autogenerated dummy bar=1.0/installed " apt list bar --verbose -- cgit v1.2.3