diff options
author | David Kalnischkies <david@kalnischkies.de> | 2016-12-31 18:23:25 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org> | 2017-02-22 16:53:45 +0100 |
commit | cd67c02330b0c2f47ab4c7c2c1cbc883dacfc453 (patch) | |
tree | d21a3dfd95d53692f706987bbd8cc7b1e35f46a3 | |
parent | c0dc26456ba74da449eae11c04c3edb3b5f1e35e (diff) |
fix minimum pkgs option for dpkg --recursive usage
Interpreting a boolean as an int works just fine – it just hasn't the
intended result – it isn't a serious problem through as the disabling of
the usage of this dpkg calling style is just an "optimization"
(cherry picked from commit 4e18c2cee6da39982cc463cafbf27eab5561099f)
-rw-r--r-- | apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc b/apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc index 2e779ca8b..d748f13b7 100644 --- a/apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc +++ b/apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ bool pkgDPkgPM::Go(APT::Progress::PackageManager *progress) dpkg_recursive_install = Cache.VS().CmpVersion("1.18.5", dpkgpkg.CurrentVer().VerStr()) <= 0; } // no point in doing this dance for a handful of packages only - unsigned int const dpkg_recursive_install_min = _config->FindB("dpkg::install::recursive::minimum", 5); + unsigned int const dpkg_recursive_install_min = _config->FindI("dpkg::install::recursive::minimum", 5); // FIXME: workaround for dpkg bug, see our ./test-bug-740843-versioned-up-down-breaks test bool const dpkg_recursive_install_numbered = _config->FindB("dpkg::install::recursive::numbered", true); |