diff options
| author | David Kalnischkies <david@kalnischkies.de> | 2016-12-31 18:23:25 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David Kalnischkies <david@kalnischkies.de> | 2016-12-31 18:23:25 +0100 |
| commit | 4e18c2cee6da39982cc463cafbf27eab5561099f (patch) | |
| tree | e922f58b7c66c0a1f29808a6cef201254533e48b /apt-pkg/deb | |
| parent | 9544398fce600fb62762c05a8a84231fd1a365b4 (diff) | |
fix minimum pkgs option for dpkg --recursive usage
Interpreting a boolean as an int works just fine – it just hasn't the
intended result – it isn't a serious problem through as the disabling of
the usage of this dpkg calling style is just an "optimization"
Diffstat (limited to 'apt-pkg/deb')
| -rw-r--r-- | apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc b/apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc index 81795641e..00943c1df 100644 --- a/apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc +++ b/apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc @@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ bool pkgDPkgPM::Go(APT::Progress::PackageManager *progress) dpkg_recursive_install = Cache.VS().CmpVersion("1.18.5", dpkgpkg.CurrentVer().VerStr()) <= 0; } // no point in doing this dance for a handful of packages only - unsigned int const dpkg_recursive_install_min = _config->FindB("dpkg::install::recursive::minimum", 5); + unsigned int const dpkg_recursive_install_min = _config->FindI("dpkg::install::recursive::minimum", 5); // FIXME: workaround for dpkg bug, see our ./test-bug-740843-versioned-up-down-breaks test bool const dpkg_recursive_install_numbered = _config->FindB("dpkg::install::recursive::numbered", true); |