| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
- drop instead of fix as it is only needed if you want to reimplement dpkg
and comes straight from the beginning of last decade (Closes: #663372)
* apt-inst/deb/debfile.cc:
- {Extract,Merge}Control() is another instance of "lets reimplement dpkg"
so shot of this code before someone ends up using this…
|
|
- typofix: respect → respecting, thanks Mike Erickson! (Closes: #664833)
|
|
- bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (no changes needed)
|
|
|
|
- ship the ftparchive, apt-extractemplates and apt-sortpkgs locales
in the apt-utils package instead of the apt package
|
|
to the more standard PACKAGE_VERSION and make it work in every file
|
|
causes timestamp changes for the mo files which therefore can't
be refcounted by dpkg for your M-A: same packages
(Closes: #659333, LP: #924628)
The commit also enables a top-level 'make update-po' and does
all the needed changes to let this work now that update-po might
be called in a freshly checkout tree
|
|
but no warnings from gcc helps
|
|
- check return of writev() as gcc recommends
* methods/mirror.cc:
- check return of chdir() as gcc recommends
* apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc:
- check return of write() a gcc recommends
* apt-inst/deb/debfile.cc:
- check return of chdir() as gcc recommends
* apt-inst/deb/dpkgdb.cc:
- check return of chdir() as gcc recommends
|
|
- update symbols file
|
|
- do not link rred against libz anymore as FileFd handles all
this transparently now
|
|
- check return of write() as gcc recommends
* apt-pkg/acquire.cc:
- check return of write() as gcc recommends
* apt-pkg/cdrom.cc:
- check return of chdir() and link() as gcc recommends
* apt-pkg/clean.cc:
- check return of chdir() as gcc recommends
* apt-pkg/contrib/netrc.cc:
- check return of asprintf() as gcc recommends
|
|
and add a comment about the need of this number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- recheck all dependencies if we changed a package in SmartConfigure
as this could break an earlier dependency (LP: #940396)
|
|
|
|
of specific packages as long as the order is okay in general
|
|
for said package i can't use it anymore in the testcase, so use another name
|
|
|
|
- fix inconsistent clog/cout usage in the debug output
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* apt-pkg/packagemanager.cc:
- fix bug in predepends handling - ensure that packages that needs
unpackaging are unpacked before they are configured (LP: #927993)
[ Julian Andres Klode ]
* apt-pkg/deb/deblistparser.cc:
- Set the Essential flag on APT instead of only Important
* apt-pkg/packagemanager.cc:
- Do not use immediate configuration for packages with the Important flag
* Treat the Important flag like the Essential flag with those differences:
- No Immediate configuration (see above)
- Not automatically installed during dist-upgrade
- No higher score for installation ordering
|
|
- fix bug in predepends handling - ensure that packages that needs
unpackaging are unpacked before they are configured (LP: #927993)
|
|
- do not warn about the ignoring of directories (Closes: #662762)
|
|
* Treat the Important flag like the Essential flag with those differences:
- No higher score for installation ordering
|
|
- No Immediate configuration (see above)
- Not automatically installed during dist-upgrade
|
|
- Do not use immediate configuration for packages with the Important flag
|
|
- Set the Essential flag on APT instead of only Important
|
|
of the integer fields as well to avoid crashes in scanf as cppchecks warns:
"(warning) scanf without field width limits can crash with huge input data"
|
|
|
|
non-primitive types."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
commit lifted the Line-length limit
|
|
|
|
that BindAddr isn't NULL after getaddrinfo()
|
|
will never be executed." from cppcheck. The fd was closed only after a
return, so invert the order of lines and be happy
|
|
initialized in the constructor." messages (no functional change)
|
|
dpkg transaction instead of ignoring it completely
|
|
- remove 'old' InRelease file if we can't get a new one before
proceeding with Release.gpg to avoid the false impression of a still
trusted repository by a (still present) old InRelease file.
Thanks to Simon Ruderich for reporting this issue! (CVE-2012-0214)
Effected are all versions >= 0.8.11
Possible attack summary:
- Attacker needs to find a user which has run at least one successful
'apt-get update' against an archive providing InRelease files.
- Create a Packages file with his preferred content.
- Attacker then prevents the download of InRelease, Release and
Release.gpg (alternatively he creates a valid Release file and sends
this, the other two files need to be missing either way).
- User updates against this, getting the modified Packages file without
any indication of being unsigned (beside the "Ign InRelease" and
"Ign Release.gpg" in the output of 'apt-get update').
=> deb files from this source are considered 'trusted' (and therefore the
user isn't asked for an additional confirmation before install)
|
|
|
|
- do not try to a void a breaks if the broken package pre-depends
on the breaker, but let dpkg auto-deconfigure it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
