| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This fixes a security issue where signatures of the
InRelease files could be circumvented in a man-in-the-middle
attack, giving attackers the ability to serve any packages
they want to a system, in turn giving them root access.
It turns out that getline() may not only return EINVAL
as stated in the documentation - it might also return
in case of an error when allocating memory.
This fix not only adds a check that reading worked
correctly, it also implicitly checks that all writes
worked by reporting any other error that occurred inside
the loop and was logged by apt.
Affected: >= 0.9.8
Reported-By: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Thanks: Jann Horn, Google Project Zero for reporting the issue
LP: #1647467
(cherry picked from commit 51be550c5c38a2e1ddfc2af50a9fab73ccf78026)
(cherry picked from commit 4ef9e0837ce139b398299431ae2294882f531d8e)
|
|
|
|
In 105503b4b470c124bc0c271bd8a50e25ecbe9133 we got a warning implemented
for unreadable files which greatly improves the behavior of apt update
already as everything will work as long as we don't need the keys
included in these files. The behavior if they are needed is still
strange through as update will fail claiming missing keys and a manual
test (which the user will likely perform as root) will be successful.
Passing the new warning generated by apt-key through to apt is a bit
strange from an interface point of view, but basically duplicating the
warning code in multiple places doesn't feel right either. That means we
have no translation for the message through as apt-key has no i18n yet.
It also means that if the user has a bunch of sources each of them will
generate a warning for each unreadable file which could result in quite
a few duplicated warnings, but "too many" is better than none.
Closes: 834973
(cherry picked from commit 29c590951f812d9e9c4f17706e34f2c3315fb1f6)
|
|
This is needed to make it possible to use installaptold multiple
times in a test case.
(originally part of commit 46e00c9062d09a642973e83a334483db1f310397)
|
|
apt-key has inconsistent behaviour if it can't read a keyring file:
Commands like 'list' skipped silently over such keyrings while 'verify'
failed hard resulting in apt to report cconfusing gpg errors (#834973).
As a first step we teach apt-key to be more consistent here skipping in
all commands over unreadable keyrings, but issuing a warning in the
process, which is as usual for apt commands displayed at the end of the
run.
(cherry picked from commit 105503b4b470c124bc0c271bd8a50e25ecbe9133)
(removed the buffering of warnings in aptwarnings.log, as we do not
have a cleanup function where we can cat it)
LP: #1642386
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 1b63558a39ee1eed7eb024cd0e164d73beb165b1.
This commit caused a regression in the unit tests: The error was
propagated to Close(), where we expected it to return true.
|
|
This uses the current Ubuntu 16.04 for testing, but it only runs
one run, presumably as root.
(adapted from commit bb315d0513b93ef111ea69106d00188f0a4ec17a)
|
|
The one in trusty does not support std::put_time(), causing the
compile to fail. This commit is specific to the 1.2 branch, as
newer branches already pull this in automatically.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
The C.UTF-8 locale is not portable, so we need to use C, otherwise
we crash on other systems. We can use std::locale::classic() for
that, which might also be a bit cheaper than using locale("C").
(cherry picked from commit 0fb16c3e678044d6d06ba8a6199b1e96487ee0d8)
|
|
In 3bdff17c894d0c3d0f813d358fc45d7a263f3552 we did it for the datetime
parsing, but we use the same style in the parsing for pdiff (where the
size of the file is in the middle of the three fields) so imbueing here
as well is a good idea.
(cherry picked from commit 1136a707b7792394ea4b1d039dda4f321fec9da4)
|
|
This time it is the formatting of floating numbers in progress
reporting with a radix charater potentially not being dot.
Followup of 7303e11ff28f920a6277c159aa46f80c007350bb. Regression of
b58e2c7c56b1416a343e81f9f80cb1f02c128e25 in so far as it exchanging
very effected with slightly less effected code.
LP: 1611010
(cherry picked from commit 0919f1df552ddf022ce4508cbf40e04eae5ef896)
|
|
Followup of b58e2c7c56b1416a343e81f9f80cb1f02c128e25.
Still a regression of sorts of 8b79c94af7f7cf2e5e5342294bc6e5a908cacabf.
Closes: 832044
(cherry picked from commit 7303e11ff28f920a6277c159aa46f80c007350bb)
|
|
Rewritten in 9febc2b238e1e322dce1f94ecbed46d595893b52 for c++ locales
usage and rewritten again in 1d742e01470bba27715a8191c50adde4b39c2f19 to
avoid a currently present stdlibc++6 bug in the std::get_time
implementation. The later implementation uses still stringstreams for
parsing, but forgot to explicitly reset the locale to something sane
(for parsing english dates that is), so date and especially the parsing
of a number is depending on the locale. Turns out, the French (among
others) format their numbers with space as thousand separator so for
some reason the stdlibc++6 thinks its a good idea to interpret the
entire datetime string as a single number instead of realizing that in
"25 Jun …" the later parts can't reasonably be part of that number even
through there are spaces there…
Workaround is hence: LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8
Closes: 828011
(cherry picked from commit 3bdff17c894d0c3d0f813d358fc45d7a263f3552)
|
|
As reported upstream in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71556
the implementation of std::get_time is currently not as accepting as
strptime is, especially in how hours should be formatted.
Just reverting 9febc2b238e1e322dce1f94ecbed46d595893b52 would be
possible, but then we would reopen the problems fixed by it, so instead
I opted here for a rewrite of the parsing logic which makes this method
a lot longer, but at least it provides the same benefits as the rewrite
in std::get_time was intended to give us and decouples us from the fix
of the issue in the standard library implementation of GCC.
LP: 1593583
(cherry picked from commit 1d742e01470bba27715a8191c50adde4b39c2f19)
|
|
HTTP/1.1 hardcodes GMT (RFC 7231 §7.1.1.1) and what is good enough for the
internet must be good enough for us™ as we reuse the implementation
internally to parse (most) dates we encounter in various places like the
Release files with their Date and Valid-Until header fields.
Implementing a fully timezone aware parser just feels too hard for no
effective benefit as it would take 5+ years (= until LTS's are out of
fashion) until a repository could use non-UTC dates and expect it to
work. Not counting non-apt implementations which might or might not
only want to encounter UTC here as well.
As a bonus, this eliminates the use of an instance of setlocale in
libapt.
Closes: 819697
(cherry picked from commit 9febc2b238e1e322dce1f94ecbed46d595893b52)
|
|
(cherry picked from commit eceb219c2a64f3f81421c3c6587380b6ae81a530)
|
|
Using C++ here avoids calling setlocale here which never really was that
ideal, but needed to avoid locale specific weekday/month names.
(cherry picked from commit e0b01a85bd8395449a88e1806ea4a4e3acdbac33)
|
|
|
|
|
|
This fixes a regression introduced in
commit 8f858d560e3b7b475c623c4e242d1edce246025a
don't leak FD in AutoProxyDetect command return parsing
which accidentally made the proxy autodetection code also read
the scripts output on stderr, not only on stdout when it switched
the code from popen() to Popen().
Reported-By: Tim Small <tim@seoss.co.uk>
(cherry picked from commit 0ecceb5bb9cc8727c117195945b7116aceb984fe)
|
|
If the dependency line does not contain spaces in the repository
but does in the dpkg status file (because dpkg normalized the
dependency list), the dpkg line might be longer than the line
in the repository. If it now happens to be longer than 1024
characters, it would be skipped, causing the hashes to be
out of date.
Note that we have to bump the minor cache version again as
this changes the format slightly, and we might get mismatches
with an older src cache otherwise.
Fixes Debian/apt#23
(cherry picked from commit 708e2f1fe99e6f067292bc909f03f12c181e4798)
|
|
Commit 3af3ac2f5ec007badeded46a94be2bd06b9917a2 (released in 1.3~pre1)
implements proper fallback for SRV, but that works actually too good
as the RFC defines that such an SRV record should indicate that the
server doesn't provide this service and apt should respect this.
The solution is hence to fail again as requested even if that isn't what
the user (and perhaps even the server admins) wanted. At least we will
print a message now explicitly mentioning SRV to point people in the
right direction.
Reported-In: https://bugs.kali.org/view.php?id=3525
Reported-By: Raphaël Hertzog
(cherry picked from commit 99fdd8034b4a5cdb0100a33d0b3d5e26079c1695)
|
|
memcpy is marked as nonnull for its input, but ignores the input anyhow
if the declared length is zero. Our SHA2 implementations do this as
well, it was "just" MD5 and SHA1 missing, so we add the length check
here as well as along the callstack as it is really pointless to do all
these method calls for "nothing".
Reported-By: gcc -fsanitize=undefined
(cherry picked from commit 644478e8db56f305601c3628a74e53de048b28c8)
|
|
If the inner Base256ToNum() returned false, it did not set
Num to a new value, causing it to be uninitialized, and thus
might have caused the function to exit despite a good result.
Also document why the Res = Num, if (Res != Num) magic is done.
Reported-By: valgrind
(cherry picked from commit cf7503d8a09ebce695423fdeb2402c456c18f3d8)
|
|
Adding 1 to the value of d->End - current makes restLength one byte
too long: If we pass memchr(current, ..., restLength) has thus
undefined behavior.
Also, reading the value of current has undefined behavior if
current >= d->End, not only for current > d->End:
Consider a string of length 1, that is d->End = d->Current + 1.
We can only read at d->Current + 0, but d->Current + 1 is beyond
the end of the string.
This probably caused several inexplicable build failures on hurd-i386
in the past, and just now caused a build failure on Ubuntu's amd64
builder.
Reported-By: valgrind
(cherry picked from commit 923c592ceb6014b31ec751b97b3ed659fa3e88ae)
|
|
This fixes a few fuzzy strings.
|
|
[jak@debian.org: This merges the state of 1.3_rc3]
|
|
I actually tried to amend the previous commit, but apparently
I forgot to add the file mode change.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
(cherry picked from commit 832f95f4d018f18ff7b3d0381206f25b5a4373a6)
|
|
If a Binary field contains one or more spaces before a comma, the
code produced a segmentation fault, as it accidentally set a pointer
to 0 instead of the value of the pointer.
If the comma is at the beginning of the field, the code would
create a binStartNext that points one element before the start
of the string, which is undefined behavior.
We also need to check that we do not exit the string during the
replacement of spaces before commas: A string of the form " ,"
would normally exit the boundary of the Buffer:
binStartNext = offset 1 ','
binEnd = offset 0 ' '
isspace_ascii(*binEnd) = true => --binEnd
=> binEnd = - 1
We get rid of the problem by only allowing spaces to be eliminated
if they are not the first character of the buffer:
binStartNext = offset 1 ','
binEnd = offset 0 ' '
binEnd > buffer = false, isspace_ascii(*binEnd) = true
=> exit loop
=> binEnd remains 0
(cherry picked from commit ce6cd75dc367b92f65e4fb539dd166d0f3361f8c)
|
|
An absolute filename for a *.deb file starts with a /. A package with
the name of the file is inserted in the cache which is provided by the
"real" package for internal reasons. The pinning code detects a regex
based wildcard by having the regex start with /. That is no problem
as a / can not be included in a package name… expect that our virtual
filename package can and does.
We fix this two ways actually: First, a regex is only being considered a
regex if it also ends with / (we don't support flags). That stops our
problem with the virtual filename packages already, but to be sure we
also do not enter the loop if matcher and package name are equal.
It has to be noted that the creation of pins for virtual packages like
the here effected filename packages is pointless as only versions can be
pinned, but checking that a package is really purely virtual is too
costly compared to just creating an unused pin.
Closes: 835818
(cherry picked from commit e950b7e2f89b5e48192cd469c963a44fff9f1450)
|
|
This fixes issues with chroots, but the goal here was to get
the test suite working on systems without dpkg.
(cherry picked from commit 2ed62ba6abcad809d1898a40950f86217af73812)
|
|
In the old days, apt-inst used to use binaries, but now it
uses the built-in support and matches using Name, and not a
Binary.
(cherry picked from commit 8a362893a18eca569f8b93c572aaf966572b9546)
|
|
I probably missed that when I did the usability work. But better
late than never.
(cherry picked from commit 75d238ba66576c04f257e9d7c0a6995721f1441d)
|
|
We basically called ourselves before, creating an endless loop.
Reported-By: clang
(cherry picked from commit d651c4cd71a43c385c3d3bcd3a9f25bf0a67f8f2)
|
|
Instead of erroring out when receiving a SIGINT, let the
child deal with it - we'll error out anyway if the child
exits with an error or due to the signal. Also ignore
SIGQUIT, as system() ignores it.
This basically fixes Bug #832593, but: we are running
the hooks via sh -c. Some shells exit with a signal
error even if the command they are executing catches
the signal and exits successfully. So far, this has
been noticed on dash, which unfortunately, is our
default shell.
Example:
$ cat trap.sh
trap 'echo int' INT; sleep 10; exit 0
$ if dash -c ./trap.sh; then echo OK: $?; else echo FAIL: $?; fi
^Cint
FAIL: 130
$ if mksh -c ./trap.sh; then echo OK: $?; else echo FAIL: $?; fi
^Cint
OK: 0
$ if bash -c ./trap.sh; then echo OK: $?; else echo FAIL: $?; fi
^Cint
OK: 0
(cherry picked from commit a6ae3d3df490e7a5a1c8324ba9dc2e63972b1529)
|
|
In af81ab9030229b4ce6cbe28f0f0831d4896fda01 we implement by-hash as a
special compression type, which breaks this filesize setting as the code
is looking for a foobar.by-hash file then. Dealing this slightly gets
us the intended value. Note that this has no direct effect as this value
will be set in other ways, too, and could only effect progress reporting.
Gbp-Dch: Ignore
(cherry picked from commit 3084ef2292642d43e533654354a4929abe55d91b)
|
|
If a server closes a connection after sending us a file that tends to
mean that its a type of server who always closes the connection – it is
therefore relatively pointless to try pipelining with it even if it
isn't a problem by itself: apt is just restarting the pipeline each
time after it got served one file and the connection is closed.
The problem starts if one or more proxies are between the server and apt
and they disagree about how the connection should be as in the
bugreporters case where the responses apt gets contain both Keep-Alive
and Proxy-Connection headers (which apt both ignores) indicating a
proxy is trying to keep a connection open while the response also
contains "Connection: close" indicating the opposite which apt
understands and respects as it is required to do.
We avoid stepping into this abyss by not performing pipelining anymore
if we got a respond with the indication to close connection if the
response was otherwise a success – error messages are sent by some
servers via this method as their pages tend to be created dynamically
and hence their size isn't known a priori to them.
Closes: #832113
(cherry picked from commit 9714d522056e5256f5a2de587d88eba7cb3291c2)
|
|
It seems completely pointless from a server-POV to sent empty header
fields, so most of them don't do it (simply proven by this limitation
existing since day one) – but it is technically allowed by the RFC as
the surounding whitespaces are optional and Github seems to like sending
"X-Geo-Block-List:\r\n" since recently (bug reports in other http
clients indicate July) at least sometimes as the reporter claims to have
seen it on https only even through it can happen with both.
Closes: 834048
(cherry picked from commit 148c049150cc39f2e40894c1684dc2aefea1117e)
|
|
Since its existence in 2010 DirectoryExists was always marked with this
attribute, but for no real reason. Arguably a check for the existence of
the file is not modifying global state, so theoretically this shouldn't
be a problem. It is wrong from a logical point of view through as
between two calls the directory could be created so the promise we made
to the compiler that it could remove the second call would be wrong, so
API wise it is wrong.
It's a bit mysterious that this is only observeable on ppc64el and can be
fixed by reordering code ever so slightly, but in the end its more our
fault for adding this attribute than the compilers fault for doing
something silly based on the attribute.
LP: 1473674
(cherry picked from commit 9445fa62386c80c9822e77484d30b2109aa0f2dc)
|
|
When checking if a file is empty, we forget to check that
fstat() actually worked.
(cherry picked from commit 15fe8e62d37bc87114c59d385bed7ceefb72886b)
|
|
If the URI had no password the username was ignored
(cherry picked from commit a1f3ac8aba0675321dd46d074af8abcbb10c19fd)
|
|
APT (usually) knows which package is essential or not, so we can avoid
passing this force flag to dpkg unconditionally if the user hasn't
chosen a non-default essential handling obscuring the information.
(cherry picked from commit d3930f8716f439c229cd3d11813823d847a2ecff)
|
|
Previously, when data could be created and sig not, we would unlink
sig, not data (and vice versa).
(cherry picked from commit d0d06f44ed60a3888528d834a799bae86c2978d5)
|
|
There is no point in trying to perform Write/Read on a FileFd which
already failed as they aren't going to work as expected, so we should
make sure that they fail early on and hard.
(cherry picked from commit 02c38073af51802c02bb104d4450e0e112d641ad)
|
|
Reported-By: cppcheck
Gbp-Dch: Ignore
(cherry picked from commit 196d590a99e309764e07c9dc23ea98897eebf53a)
|
|
If another file in the transaction fails and hence dooms the transaction
we can end in a situation in which a -patched file (= rred writes the
result of the patching to it) remains in the partial/ directory.
The next apt call will perform the rred patching again and write its
result again to the -patched file, but instead of starting with an empty
file as intended it will override the content previously in the file
which has the same result if the new content happens to be longer than
the old content, but if it isn't parts of the old content remain in the
file which will pass verification as the new content written to it
matches the hashes and if the entire transaction passes the file will be
moved the lists/ directory where it might or might not trigger errors
depending on if the old content which remained forms a valid file
together with the new content.
This has no real security implications as no untrusted data is involved:
The old content consists of a base file which passed verification and a
bunch of patches which all passed multiple verifications as well, so the
old content isn't controllable by an attacker and the new one isn't
either (as the new content alone passes verification). So the best an
attacker can do is letting the user run into the same issue as in the
report.
Closes: #831762
(cherry picked from commit 0e071dfe205ad21d8b929b4bb8164b008dc7c474)
|
|
Also fixes message itself to mention the correct option name as noticed
in #832113.
(cherry picked from commit b9c20219dc17db1d29eaf297263a4b008bd1b90b)
|
|
We read the entire input file we want to patch anyhow, so we can also
calculate the hash for that file and compare it with what he had
expected it to be.
Note that this isn't really a security improvement as a) the file we
patch is trusted & b) if the input is incorrect, the result will hardly be
matching, so this is just for failing slightly earlier with a more
relevant error message (althrough, in terms of rred its ignored and
complete download attempt instead).
(cherry picked from commit 6e71ec6fcdcaa926c98fa58cd4af38e42556df15)
|
