| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Reported-By: Helmut Grohne on IRC
|
|
If the architecture list is empty somehow, fail normally.
LP: #1549819
|
|
The EDSP output generated by apt didn't include the versioned provides
information so that every provides looked like an unversioned one in the
eyes of an external resolver.
|
|
Closes: #814754
|
|
pkgAcqChangelog has the default behaviour of downloading a changelog to
a temporary directory (inside /tmp, not /tmp directly), which is cleaned
up on shutdown, but this can be overridden to store the changelog more
permanently – but that caries a permission problem.
For changelog we can 'easily' solve this by always downloading to a
temporary directory and only move it out of there on done.
|
|
If pkgAcqChangelog is told to acquire the changelog for a version it
will check first if this version is installed on the disk and if so will
use the local changelog in /usr/share/doc (possibily/likely gz
compressed) instead of downloading the file from the web.
An option is provided to disable this, which is enabled by default for
the Ubuntu vendor as they truncate the local changelogs – and for apts
--print-uris action.
|
|
Build system messed up the 1.2.2 commit by not updating the
.po files properly, so they are now.
|
|
Otherwise the test run as root fails seeing the
W: Can't drop privileges for downloading as file 'foo_1.tar.gz' couldn't be
accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied)
warning in a command which isn't supposed to warn.
One trivial test, two fixups and still counting…
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Travis still uses a dpkg version which defaults to gz and as which
compression is picked isn't all to important as long as one is just
accept any.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
This tests the fix for #812994, #813000
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
Regression introduced in a249b3e6fd798935a02b769149c9791a6fa6ef16, which
in the case of an invalid cache would build the first part unlocked and
later pick up the (still unlocked) cache for further processing, so the
system got never locked and apt would end up complaining about being
unable to release the lock at shutdown.
The far more common case of having a valid cache worked as expected and
hence covered up the problem – especially as tests who would have
noticed it are simulations only, which do not lock.
Closes: 814139
Reported-By: Balint Reczey <balint@balintreczey.hu>
Reported-By: Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> on IRC
|
|
If we just reopened the file, we also need to reset the current
seek position when we reset the buffer, otherwise the code will
not try to seek to the position given to Skip (from 0), but will
try to seek to old offset + the position given to skip.
Closes: #812994, #813000
|
|
|
|
When writing into the buffer write to free() bytes starting
at getend(), instead of buffersize_max bytes at get()
-> get() is a read pointer.
This makes no difference in practice though, as we reset
the buffer before the call, so start = end = 0.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
|
|
We cannot just return false without setting an error,
as InternalWrite does not set one itself.
|
|
We basically ignored errors from writing and flushing, let's
not do that.
|
|
I find the per-binary overrides a bit confusing in their current
form, but let's tell the user the truth.
Closes: #812111
|
|
|
|
Include <stdlib.h> to ensure that mkdtemp(3) is defined to improve
general portability and fix a specific build failure on Android.
Closes: #807367
|
|
Microoptimization, but still gives a measurable 2-3% improvement
when using commands with lots of output like `apt list`.
|
|
We don't need the dependencies for obvious reasons and we don't need the
candidate version either, so building a pkgDepCache is wasted effort,
which we can stop doing now that build-dep cleared the path.
|
|
The later just calls the earlier, but the later needs the fullblown
dependency cache to be initialized, which is a very costly operation and
isn't done anymore that early in the run as we would need to throw away
and rebuild it again after we got all the information about source pkgs.
As we end up with a nullptr for the pkgDepCache, we use a slightly
longer calling convention to make sure that we use the pkgCache
directly, avoiding nullptr induced segfaults and costly operations.
Git-Dch: Ignore
Reported-By: Balint Reczey <balint@balintreczey.hu>
|
|
It's not cross-satisfiable.
Reported-by: Helmut Grohne
|
|
|
|
It's a fairly expensive call and it's called on every package,
even though it's usually only used when we're interested in
a small number of packages.
Long description is currently only shown by this function
when using `apt search X --full`.
On my PC, this patch speeds up `apt list` by roughly 20%
and `apt list --installed` by 1-2%.
|
|
Closes: 813467
|
|
It makes no sense to split a large block into multiple small
blocks, so when we have the chance to write them unbuffered,
do so.
|
|
We do not need the loop, FileFd::Private() handles this for us.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
We want to check whether the amount of free space is smaller
than the requested write size. Checking maxsize - size() is
incorrect for bufferstart >= 0, as size() = end - start.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
APT has a different understanding than dpkg (#748936) what matches and
what doesn't match an architecture specification as it isn't converting
back (and forward) to Debian triplets. That has to eventually be solved
some way or the other, but until that happens we change the matching in
apt so that porters can continue their work on non-gnu libc-ports even
if policy doesn't specify that yet (and dpkg just supporting it "by
accident" via triplets).
The initial patch was reformatted, fixed in terms of patterns containing
"any-any", dealing with expanding an arch without libc to gnu while a
pattern expands libc to any, the parsedepends test was fixed (the new
if's were inserted one step too early) and another test just for the
specifications added.
Closes: #812212
Thanks: Bálint Réczey for initial patch
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
|
|
The Date field in the Release file is useful to avoid allowing an
attacker to 'downgrade' a user to earlier Release files (and hence to
older states of the archieve with open security bugs). It is also needed
to allow a user to define min/max values for the validation of a Release
file (with or without the Release file providing a Valid-Until field).
APT wasn't formally requiring this field before through and (agrueable
not binding and still incomplete) online documentation declares it
optional (until now), so we downgrade the error to a warning for now to
give repository creators a bit more time to adapt – the bigger ones
should have a Date field for years already, so the effected group should
be small in any case.
It should be noted that earlier apt versions had this as an error
already, but only showed it if a Valid-Until field was present (or the
user tried to used the configuration items for min/max valid-until).
Closes: 809329
|
|
It is a bit academic to support values which aren't big enough to fit even
the hashtables without resizing, but cleaning up ensures that we do the
right thing (aka not segfaulting) even if something goes wrong in these
deep layers. You still can't have very very small values through…
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Part of hidden classes, so conversion is abi-free.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
These virtual methods are implemented in hidden classes, so we can drop
them without breaking the ABI.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
In 321213f0dcdcdaab04e01663e7a047b261400c9c Andreas Cadhalpun corrected
the incorrect overriding of earlier better-fitting results with later
(semi-)matches – but that broke the case in which packages are in multiple
releases in the same version (and the user has both releases configured).
Closes: 812497
|
|
In commit a221efc331693f8905da870141756c892911c433 I promoted the source
package name and version to the binary cache for faster access by e.g.
EDSP, but due to changing the interpretation length to soon we always
ignored the version part of the Source field, so that packages ended up
having the binary version as source version – which while usually just
fine it is wrong for binary rebuilds.
Closes: 812492
|
|
Avoid the dependency on a specific current path for the tar test and
ensure that _system is correctly initialized (gcc-6 runs into a segfault
otherwise and with it fixed starts to depend on the multi-arch
configuration of the running system… not good).
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Reported-By: cppcheck
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
gcc correctly reports that we check for the same value twice, expect
that the manpage of read(2) tells us to do it for portability, so to
make both sides happy lets add a little #if'ing here.
Reported-By: gcc-6
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
This would mess up reference counting and should not be allowed
(it could be implemented correctly, but it would not be efficient
and we do not need it).
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
build-dep was implemented by parsing the build-dependencies of a package
and figuring out which packages to install/remove based on this. That
means that for the first level of dependencies build-dep was
implementing its very own resolver with all the benefits (aka: bugs)
this gives us for not using the existing resolver for all levels.
Making this work involves generating a dummy binary package with fitting
Depends and Conflicts and as we can't create them out of thin air the
cache generation needs to be involved so we end up writing a Packages
file which we want to parse – after we have parsed the other Packages
files already. With .dsc/.deb files we could add them before we started
parsing anything.
With a bit of care we can avoid generating too much data we have to
throw away again (as many parts assume that e.g. the count of packages
doesn't change midair), so that on a speed front there shouldn't be
much of a difference, but output can be slightly confusing as if we have
a completely valid cache on disk the "Reading package lists... Done" is
printed two times – but apt is pretty quick about it in that case.
Closes: #137560, #444930, #489911, #583914, #728317, #812173
|
|
Proper debian packages do not contain ':' in the package name, so for
real packages this is a non-issue, but apt itself frequently makes use
of packages with such an illegal name for internal proposes.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
If you have chosen to install a foreign architecture provider it is
more reasonable to keep this provider instead of removing this one to
replace it with a newer version from a (usually) more preferred arch.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
To resolve dependencies like "pkg:arch" we create a package with the
name "pkg:arch" and the architecture "any". We create these packages
only if a dependency needs it as these kind of dependencies aren't that
common. This commit ensured that in the even this architecture specific
dependency is the only relation this package has we still create the
underlying package to have them available in provides resolution.
|
