| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We do not need the loop, FileFd::Private() handles this for us.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
We want to check whether the amount of free space is smaller
than the requested write size. Checking maxsize - size() is
incorrect for bufferstart >= 0, as size() = end - start.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
APT has a different understanding than dpkg (#748936) what matches and
what doesn't match an architecture specification as it isn't converting
back (and forward) to Debian triplets. That has to eventually be solved
some way or the other, but until that happens we change the matching in
apt so that porters can continue their work on non-gnu libc-ports even
if policy doesn't specify that yet (and dpkg just supporting it "by
accident" via triplets).
The initial patch was reformatted, fixed in terms of patterns containing
"any-any", dealing with expanding an arch without libc to gnu while a
pattern expands libc to any, the parsedepends test was fixed (the new
if's were inserted one step too early) and another test just for the
specifications added.
Closes: #812212
Thanks: Bálint Réczey for initial patch
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
|
|
The Date field in the Release file is useful to avoid allowing an
attacker to 'downgrade' a user to earlier Release files (and hence to
older states of the archieve with open security bugs). It is also needed
to allow a user to define min/max values for the validation of a Release
file (with or without the Release file providing a Valid-Until field).
APT wasn't formally requiring this field before through and (agrueable
not binding and still incomplete) online documentation declares it
optional (until now), so we downgrade the error to a warning for now to
give repository creators a bit more time to adapt – the bigger ones
should have a Date field for years already, so the effected group should
be small in any case.
It should be noted that earlier apt versions had this as an error
already, but only showed it if a Valid-Until field was present (or the
user tried to used the configuration items for min/max valid-until).
Closes: 809329
|
|
It is a bit academic to support values which aren't big enough to fit even
the hashtables without resizing, but cleaning up ensures that we do the
right thing (aka not segfaulting) even if something goes wrong in these
deep layers. You still can't have very very small values through…
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Part of hidden classes, so conversion is abi-free.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
These virtual methods are implemented in hidden classes, so we can drop
them without breaking the ABI.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
In 321213f0dcdcdaab04e01663e7a047b261400c9c Andreas Cadhalpun corrected
the incorrect overriding of earlier better-fitting results with later
(semi-)matches – but that broke the case in which packages are in multiple
releases in the same version (and the user has both releases configured).
Closes: 812497
|
|
In commit a221efc331693f8905da870141756c892911c433 I promoted the source
package name and version to the binary cache for faster access by e.g.
EDSP, but due to changing the interpretation length to soon we always
ignored the version part of the Source field, so that packages ended up
having the binary version as source version – which while usually just
fine it is wrong for binary rebuilds.
Closes: 812492
|
|
Avoid the dependency on a specific current path for the tar test and
ensure that _system is correctly initialized (gcc-6 runs into a segfault
otherwise and with it fixed starts to depend on the multi-arch
configuration of the running system… not good).
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Reported-By: cppcheck
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
gcc correctly reports that we check for the same value twice, expect
that the manpage of read(2) tells us to do it for portability, so to
make both sides happy lets add a little #if'ing here.
Reported-By: gcc-6
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
This would mess up reference counting and should not be allowed
(it could be implemented correctly, but it would not be efficient
and we do not need it).
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
build-dep was implemented by parsing the build-dependencies of a package
and figuring out which packages to install/remove based on this. That
means that for the first level of dependencies build-dep was
implementing its very own resolver with all the benefits (aka: bugs)
this gives us for not using the existing resolver for all levels.
Making this work involves generating a dummy binary package with fitting
Depends and Conflicts and as we can't create them out of thin air the
cache generation needs to be involved so we end up writing a Packages
file which we want to parse – after we have parsed the other Packages
files already. With .dsc/.deb files we could add them before we started
parsing anything.
With a bit of care we can avoid generating too much data we have to
throw away again (as many parts assume that e.g. the count of packages
doesn't change midair), so that on a speed front there shouldn't be
much of a difference, but output can be slightly confusing as if we have
a completely valid cache on disk the "Reading package lists... Done" is
printed two times – but apt is pretty quick about it in that case.
Closes: #137560, #444930, #489911, #583914, #728317, #812173
|
|
Proper debian packages do not contain ':' in the package name, so for
real packages this is a non-issue, but apt itself frequently makes use
of packages with such an illegal name for internal proposes.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
If you have chosen to install a foreign architecture provider it is
more reasonable to keep this provider instead of removing this one to
replace it with a newer version from a (usually) more preferred arch.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
To resolve dependencies like "pkg:arch" we create a package with the
name "pkg:arch" and the architecture "any". We create these packages
only if a dependency needs it as these kind of dependencies aren't that
common. This commit ensured that in the even this architecture specific
dependency is the only relation this package has we still create the
underlying package to have them available in provides resolution.
|
|
|
|
Git-Dch: ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: ignore
Thanks: David Kalnischkies
|
|
Thanks: Thomas Reusch
|
|
I only looked at parameters in the previous commit, which was
not enough: One place also generated local string views. In this
case, we only need to make ArchA dynamic, as NameA is not used
after the FindPkg() call.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
It turns out that StringViews might need to be remapped in some
places because they come from the cache. For example, some sites
pass a Ver.VerStr() to NewProvides().
Such a StringView would become invalid during the duration of
the call if the cache is remapped, causing the program to die
with a segmentation fault.
We can take care of those issues by remapping string views in
the same way we remap all the iterators. String views are only
remapped if they point into the cache though, this allows us
to write more generic code on the callee site without having
to check whether the view points into the cache or not.
That's not as efficient as possible, but the overhead does not
appear to be measurable.
Closes: #812251
|
|
This allows us to check if a value to be remapped was inside
the cache or not, which will become useful at a later point.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
|
|
|
|
APT::StringView is supposed to be a temporary measure, until support
for the standardized string_view is widely available. Introducing
additional unstandardized features just makes porting to the
standard version harder.
The constexpr constructor also won't have any real effect on most
systems, as the compiler will happily optimise the strlen() call
away for constant strings.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
The commit also adds a few trivial tests
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
The position returned is supposed to be the position of the character
counted from the start of the string, but if we used the substr calling
overloads the skipped over prefix wasn't considered. The pos parameter
of rfind had also the wrong semantic.
|
|
|
|
Introduced in 9d2a8a7388cf3b0bbbe92f6b0b30a533e1167f40 apt tries to
merge actions like downloading the same (as judged by hashes) file
into doing it once. The implementation was very simple in that it isn't
planing at all. Turns out that it works 90% of the time just fine, but
has issues in more complicated situations in which items can be in
different stages downloading different files emitting potentially the
"wrong" hash – like while pdiffs are worked on we might end up copying
the patch instead of the result file giving us very strange errors in
return. Reverting the change until we can implement a better planing
solution seems to be the best course of action even if its sad.
Closes: 810046
|
|
Architectures for packages which do not belong to the native nor a
foreign architecture (dubbed barbarian for now) which are marked
M-A:foreign still provide in their own architecture even if not for
others. Also, other M-A:foreign (and allowed) packages provide in these
barbarian architectures.
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Parsing XML entity files in shell isn't exactly nice and causing the
substitution with a while-read loop isn't either, but it seems to be
good enough for the moment without changing too much.
Thanks: Niels Thykier for reporting on IRC
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Seems like the interaction between wildcards and exemptions has changed
slightly, so be positively more explicit about our ignoring of en.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Closes: #734922
|
|
This prevents a test suite failure on systems with weird umasks.
Also set umask 000 at the beginning so we can actually check for
that anywhere.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
Just enabling it for anyone breaks with HTTP/1.0 servers and
proxies sometimes.
Closes: #810796
|
|
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
Fix reproducibility issue due to readdir() order by sorting
the list of sources to be built and linked.
[jak@debian.org: Added summary and fixed typo]
Closes: #810509
|
|
If a package has no description, we would crash in search. While
this should not happen, there seem to be some weird cases where
it does.
A safer way might be to make the whole parser thing safe
against this, so pkgRecords::Lookup(Desc.FileList()) works
and returns a parser where all values are empty. This would
also fix all other instances of this bug, if there are any.
Closes: #810622
|
