| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This can happen if the request is already a well-formed request all by
itself (e.g. the package has no dependencies), but the resolver found
a reason to not accept it as solution. Our edsp 'dump' solver e.g.
shouldn't be able to trigger install, which it does otherwise.
|
|
"I am going to merge it tomorrow…"
|
|
|
|
dpkg on Ubuntu 12.04 does not seem to support parsing arch-specific
dependencies, so we try to detect if we face such a dpkg in the test.
In the other test the order depends on libdb, which changes per arch, so
we just run it through our sorting binary and be happy (hopefully).
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Reported-By: clang++ -Werror
|
|
Reported-By: scan-build
|
|
The Buffer was allocated using strndup() so we need to free it using
free() instead of delete[]
|
|
Fix incorrect cast in pkgDepCache::Policy::GetCandidateVer()
Reported-By: clang -fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer
|
|
ContentsExtract::~ContentsExtract() needs to use free() because
Data got allocated via realloc()
Reported-By: clang -fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer
|
|
|
|
Git-Dch: ignore
|
|
3163087b moved SigWinch(int) from apt-get.cc to private-output.cc
without moving #include <sys/ioctl.h>, making SigWinch a nop.
Closes: 748430, 747942
|
|
As outlined in #748355 apt segfaulted if it encountered a loop between a
package pre-depending on a package conflicting with the previous as it
ended up in an endless loop trying to unpack 'the other package'.
In this specific case as an essential package is involved a lot of force
needs to be applied, but can also be caused by 'normal' tight loops and
highlights a problem in how we handle breaks which we want to avoid.
The fix comes in multiple entangled changes:
1. All Smart* calls are guarded with loop detection. Some already had it,
some had parts of it, some did it incorrect, and some didn't even try.
2. temporary removes to avoid a loop (which is done if a loop is
detected) prevent the unpack of this looping package (we tried to unpack
it to avoid the conflict/breaks, but due to a loop we couldn't, so we
remove/deconfigure it instead which means we can't unpack it now)
3. handle conflicts and breaks very similar instead of duplicating most
of the code. The only remaining difference is, as it should:
deconfigure is enough for breaks, for conflicts we need the big hammer
|
|
These failure conditions come with an error message attached and the
conditions aren't workaroundable (otherwise this would have been done
instead of returning failure), so not erroring out here means that we
execute dpkg later on with a known not-working ordering adding insult
(our own error messages at the end) to injury (dpkg failure).
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
Reported-By: gcc
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
In bugreport #747261 I confirmed with this testcase that apt actually
supports the requested architecture-specific conflicts already since
2012 with commit cef094c2ec8214b2783a2ac3aa70cf835381eae1.
The old test only does simulations which are handy to check apt,
this one builds 'real' packages to see if dpkg agrees with us.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Version/Architecture information in a Translation-$lang file is
not allowed, so don't try to parse it. This is a fix for a bugreport
where a Translation-en file contained the content of the regular
Packages file (probably due to local FS corruption). This lead to
strange error messages on file download.
Thanks to Thomas Reusch for the report.
|
|
debian/sid
|
|
|
|
|
|
debian/sid
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 697c9314c8ba24f3e393b5de11a3fad7adae4bfc.
Conflicts:
debian/rules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes: 746434
|
|
gcc reports in testcase ./test-bug-596498-trusted-unsigned-repo:
apt-pkg/acquire-item.cc:1059:7: runtime error: load of value 234, which
is not a valid value for type 'bool'
This happens as the bool Verify is initialized only in one of the two
constructors of the pkgAcqIndex class. It isn't a problem through as the
verification controlled by this flag is optional and used to fail early
on garbage files (like network portal pages) instead of later on in the
hashsum verification or while parsing (the then untrusted) file.
Reported-By: gcc-4.9 -fsanitize=undefined
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Trần Ngọc Quân <vnwildman@gmail.com>
|
|
Vendors like ubuntu need to change some options, so giving them
a way to do this less painfully avoids reducing differences.
|
|
gzip only gives us 32bit of size, storing it in a 64bit container and
doing a 32bit flip on it has therefore unintended results.
So we just go with a exact size container and let the flipping be handled
by eglibc provided le32toh removing our #ifdef machinery.
Closes: 745866
|
|
|
|
Those files are in apt-private and used from there.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
beside reducing code a bit, it avoids oddball problems while building
the string and doesn't trigger static analyse warnings.
|
|
Debian wheezy shipped MultiArch to the masses and the predictions
remained true in sofar as little changes in apt itself and many
other frontends were needed compared to the fallout if done differently.
The info included is this file is therefore no longer current and adds
no useful information anymore, so we can drop it for good.
|
|
|
|
Modified by commiter to not publicily export the codename (as the
manpages do not use it that way) and removing the included additional
derives logic as it was not working (the link always exists at that
point) and isn't needed as we do the special casing for debian mainly
because it would shallow all distributions otherwise.
(similar, but not that strong for ubuntu)
Closes: 743595
|
|
The bugreport highlights the problem with an empty package name. We fix
this by 'ignoring' these so that it behaves just like "apt-get install".
The deeper problem is that modifier strings can be longer than a package
name in which case the comparison doesn't make sense, so don't compare
then. Was not noticed so far as all modifiers are of length 1, so the
only package name shorter than this is in fact the empty package name.
Closes: 744940
|
|
In bug #740673 various issues in the CD-ROM handling code were
identified, while most the issues ended up being fixed in another way,
the unmounting of the CD-ROM in error cases was not tackled so far.
(The patch was modified by the commiter to apply)
|
|
config files
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
