Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Inspired by the rest of the patch in 661537, but abstract the
parsing of various ways of setting the build profiles more so it can
potentially be reused and all apt parts have the same behaviour.
Especially config options, cmdline options and environment will not be
combined as proposed as this isn't APTs usual behaviour and dpkg doesn't
do it either, so one overrides the other as it normally does.
|
|
Build-dependencies are now able to include a <profile.foo …>
specification limiting usage similar to already supported [arch …].
More details: https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec
Closes: 661537
|
|
Automatically handle the override of list options via its parent value
which can even be a comma-separated list of values. It also adds an easy
way of providing a default for the list.
|
|
It can be useful to have a whole makefile available for vendor setup,
but by providing a basic one we can deal with the simple cases more
easily (and changes to the system are presumably easier).
|
|
Prevents that "old" dependencies have an influence in the scoring.
With positive dependencies this is usually not a problem, but negative
dependencies can linger around for a long time.
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
versioned -dev packages like db and boost have the problem of no
dependencies which would give them a competitive advantage against an
older incarnation of the -dev package, so they tend to be kept back
until the old version is removed from the archive, which, if the user
has older releases in its sources can take a long time (or never happens).
The newer version has a conflicts/breaks against the older one, but the
older one hasn't against the newer, so by giving via the conflicts the
older one a reduced score the newer one can win if there is no other
reason to keep it. If both have a conflict against each other the
scoring will cancel itself out, so no harm done.
This gives "action" a slightly bigger edge in breaks/conflicts cases
than before, but holding back isn't a really good solution anyway.
|
|
libapt-pkg depends on the other compressors, and now that
xz is the default in many cases, it should depend on that
one as well.
|
|
feature/apt-download-file
Conflicts:
cmdline/apt-helper.cc
test/integration/framework
test/integration/test-apt-https-no-redirect
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Trần Ngọc Quân <vnwildman@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debian/tests/control: Add missing build-essential, fakeroot, and wget test
dependencies.
debian/tests/run-tests: Pin locale to C to avoid test failures in other
locales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
http-method from METHODSDIR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sync the deb(5) format support with latest dpkg, by allowing
uncompressed tar members and xz compressed control.tar. This
also refactors the control.tar member extraction by using
ExtractTarMember(), which also means future changes only need
to be implemented in a single place.
|
|
Generalize DebFile::ExtractArchive() to take a member base name, so that
we can reuse it for control.tar member extraction too.
|
|
This allows for uncompressed tar files, as the decompressor process will
not get interposed in-between the file descriptors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
apt-private/acqprogress.cc
|
|
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
|
|
|
|
should not be marked not-for-autoremoval
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
debian/apt.auto-removal.sh
|
|
The current PackageContainerInterface::FromString() will do a
FromFnmatch() first and then FromRegEx(). This commit reverts
that change to restore the old behavior to only look for RegEx
and not glob-style pattern. The rational is that:
a) currently a fnmatch() is misleadingly reported as a regex match to
the user (Bug#738880)
b) a fnmatch may match something different than a a RegEx so the
change broke a published interface
|
|
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Commit 6008b79adf1d7ea5607fab87a355d664c8725026 should have been guarded
by "Git-Dch: Ignore", but it wasn't and I only noticed it with the Close
message via deity thinking "hehe, I wonder if someone is gonna notice".
Looks like someone did: hats off to reddit user itisOmegakai!
Good to know that what I do isn't only monitored by goverments. :)
As there is another instance of basically the same code we just factor
out the code a bit and reuse, so its even cleaner and not only simpler.
Reported-By: scan-build
|