| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Again no practical difference, but for consistency a boolean option
should really be accessed via a boolean method rather than an int
especially if you happen to try setting the option to "true" …
Gbp-Dch: Ignore
(cherry picked from commit c15ba854b6736696f164e4d2c243a944e2d4006e)
|
|
If a planner lets actions to be figured out by dpkg in pending calls
these actions aren't mentioned in a simulation. While that might be
a good thing for debugging, it would be a change in behavior and
especially if a planner avoids explicit removals could be confusing for
users. As such we perform the same 'trick' as in the dpkg implementation
by performing explicitly what would be done by the pending calls.
To save us some work and avoid desyncs we perform a layer violation by
using deb/ code in the generic simulation – and further we perform ugly
dynamic_cast to avoid breaking the ABI for nothing; aptitude is the only
other user of the simulation class according to codesearch.d.n and for
that our little trick works. It just isn't working if you happen to
extend pkgSimulate or otherwise manage to call the protected Go methods
directly – which isn't very realistic/practical.
|
|
Create and log the EDSP(like) request even if we use the internal
resolver.
|
|
This allows to differentiate properly between 'apt-get upgrade', 'apt
upgrade' and 'apt full-upgrade'.
|
|
The old prettyprinters have only access to the struct they pretty print,
which isn't enough usually as we want to know for a package also a bit
of state information like which version is the candidate.
We therefore need to pull the DepCache into context and hence use a
temporary struct which is printed instead of the iterator itself.
|
|
Dynamically allocate KillList in order to avoid an overflow when
more than 100 elements would be written to it.
This happened while playing around with the status file from
Bug#701069 on a modern system.
|
|
Reported-By: cppcheck
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
This was discussed a while ago on #debian-apt and now that I see myself
making this mistake lets bite the bullet and fix it in the easy way out
version: Using a new name which fits with a similar named setter and
deprecate the old method instead of 'hostily' changing API.
Closes: #803471
|
|
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
|
|
More standardization
|
|
We aren't and we will not be really compatible again with the previous
stable abi, so lets drop these markers (which never made it into a
released version) for good as they have outlived their intend already.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Doing this disables the implicit copy assignment operator (among others)
which would cause hovac if used on the classes as it would just copy the
pointer, not the data the d-pointer points to. For most of the classes
we don't need a copy assignment operator anyway and in many classes it
was broken before as many contain a pointer of some sort.
Only for our Cacheset Container interfaces we define an explicit copy
assignment operator which could later be implemented to copy the data
from one d-pointer to the other if we need it.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
|
|
Commit 9ec748ff103840c4c65471ca00d3b72984131ce4 from Feb 23 last year
adds a version check after 8daf68e366fa9fa2794ae667f51562663856237c
added 8 days earlier negative points for breaks/conflicts with the
intended that only dependencies which are satisfied propagate points
(aka: old conflicts do not).
The implementation was needlessly complex and flawed through preventing
positive dependencies from gaining points like they did before these
commits making library transitions harder instead of simpler. It worked
out anyhow most of the time out of pure 'luck' (and other ways of
gaining points) or got miss attributed to being a temporary hick-up.
Closes: 774924
|
|
Adding a new parameter (with a default) is an ABI break, but you can
overload a method, which is "just" an API break for everyone doing
references to this method (aka: nobody).
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Previously, we had a start and a done of the calculation printed by
higher-level code, but this got intermixed by progress reporting from an
external solver or the output of autoremove code…
The higherlevel code is now only responsible for instantiating a
progress object of its choosing (if it wants progress after all) and the
rest will be handled by the upgrade code. Either it is used to show the
progress of the external solver or the internal solver will give some
hints about its overall progress. The later isn't really a proper
progress as it will jump forward after each substep, but that is at
least a bit better than before without any progress indication.
Fixes also the 'strange' non-display of this progress line in -q=1, while
all others are shown, which is reflected by all testcase changes.
|
|
A package which can't be downloaded anymore is very likely dropped from
a release and can therefore no longer be 'standard' (or similar). We
therefore do not grant points for them anymore and demote them to
prio:extra instead which helps other packages breaking them away even if
they have a lower priority.
The testcase was initially created by Michael Vogt and just amended.
|
|
Beside being a bit cleaner it hopefully also resolves oddball problems
I have with high levels of parallel jobs.
Git-Dch: Ignore
Reported-By: iwyu (include-what-you-use)
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
Reported-By: gcc -Wuseless-cast
|
|
Prevents that "old" dependencies have an influence in the scoring.
With positive dependencies this is usually not a problem, but negative
dependencies can linger around for a long time.
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
versioned -dev packages like db and boost have the problem of no
dependencies which would give them a competitive advantage against an
older incarnation of the -dev package, so they tend to be kept back
until the old version is removed from the archive, which, if the user
has older releases in its sources can take a long time (or never happens).
The newer version has a conflicts/breaks against the older one, but the
older one hasn't against the newer, so by giving via the conflicts the
older one a reduced score the newer one can win if there is no other
reason to keep it. If both have a conflict against each other the
scoring will cancel itself out, so no harm done.
This gives "action" a slightly bigger edge in breaks/conflicts cases
than before, but holding back isn't a really good solution anyway.
|
|
|
|
This moves the ListUpdate/AquireUpdate out of the "catch-all"
algorithm.{cc,h} file into its own update.{cc,h}
|
|
The upgrade releated code is moved into upgrade.{cc,h} and
all pkg*Upgrade* prototypes are included in algorihms.h to
avoid breaking API (unless build with APT_9_CLEANER_HEADERS).
|
|
|
|
|
|
experimental
|
|
Conflicts:
debian/changelog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the past packages were flagged "Protected" so that install/
remove markings where issued before the ProblemResolver.
Nowadays, the marking methods check if they are allowed to modify
the marking of a package instead, so that markings set by FromUser
calls are not overwritten anymore by automatic calls which elimates
the need for InstallProtect which just eats CPU now.
The method itself is left untouched for now in case frontend needs it
still for some wierd usecase, but they should be eliminated.
|
|
|
|
- Do not propagate negative scores from rdepends. Propagating the absolute
value of a negative score may boost obsolete packages and keep them
installed instead of installing their successors. (Closes: #699759)
|
|
Closes: #697577
|
|
Closes: #697577
|
|
- fix package-pointer array memory leak in ResolveByKeepInternal()
|
|
- ensure pkgProblemResolver calls MarkDelete without FromUser set
so that it can't overrule holds and the protection flag
|
|
by introducing a pseudo-architecture 'none' so that the small group of
users with these packages can get right of them without introducing too
much hassle for other users (Closes: #686346)
|
|
- set pkgCacheGen::Essential to "all" again (Closes: #675449)
* apt-pkg/algorithms.cc:
- force install only for one essential package out of a group
|
|
- fix memory leak of Flags in pkgSimulate by a proper destructor
|
|
- factor out of ListUpdate a AcquireUpdate to be able to provide your
own pkgAcquire fetcher to the wrapper
|
|
* apt-pkg/packagemanager.cc:
- fix bug in predepends handling - ensure that packages that needs
unpackaging are unpacked before they are configured (LP: #927993)
[ Julian Andres Klode ]
* apt-pkg/deb/deblistparser.cc:
- Set the Essential flag on APT instead of only Important
* apt-pkg/packagemanager.cc:
- Do not use immediate configuration for packages with the Important flag
* Treat the Important flag like the Essential flag with those differences:
- No Immediate configuration (see above)
- Not automatically installed during dist-upgrade
- No higher score for installation ordering
|
|
- No Immediate configuration (see above)
- Not automatically installed during dist-upgrade
|
|
initialized in the constructor." messages (no functional change)
|
|
- use a signed int instead of short for score calculation as upgrades
become so big now that it can overflow (Closes: #657732, LP: #917173)
|
|
- don't break out of the main-resolver loop for Breaks to deal with all
of them in a single iteration (Closes: #657695, LP: #922485)
|
|
|
