summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/apt-pkg/pkgcachegen.cc
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-02-22avoid validate/delete/load race in cache generationDavid Kalnischkies
Keeping the Fd of the cache file we have validated around to later load it into the mmap ensures not only that we load the same file (which wouldn't really be a problem in practice), but that this file also still exists and wasn't deleted e.g. by a 'apt clean' call run in parallel. (cherry picked from commit 06606f073210fe3902fe92d5ff77fa1ab621b972)
2016-07-01do not treat same-version local debs as downgradeDavid Kalnischkies
As the volatile sources are parsed last they were sorted behind the dpkg/status file and hence are treated as a downgrade, which isn't really what you want to happen as from a user POV its an upgrade.
2016-03-06Prevent double remapping of iterators and string viewsJulian Andres Klode
If an iterator or a stringview has multiple dynamic objects registered with it, it may be remapped twice. Prevent that by noting which iterators/views we have seen and not remapping one if we have already seen it. We most likely do not have any instance of multiple dynamics on a single object, but let's play safe - the overhead is not high.
2016-01-27deal better with (very) small apt::cache-start valuesDavid Kalnischkies
It is a bit academic to support values which aren't big enough to fit even the hashtables without resizing, but cleaning up ensures that we do the right thing (aka not segfaulting) even if something goes wrong in these deep layers. You still can't have very very small values through… Git-Dch: Ignore
2016-01-26convert Version() and Architecture() to APT::StringViewDavid Kalnischkies
Part of hidden classes, so conversion is abi-free. Git-Dch: Ignore
2016-01-25reimplement build-dep via apts normal resolverDavid Kalnischkies
build-dep was implemented by parsing the build-dependencies of a package and figuring out which packages to install/remove based on this. That means that for the first level of dependencies build-dep was implementing its very own resolver with all the benefits (aka: bugs) this gives us for not using the existing resolver for all levels. Making this work involves generating a dummy binary package with fitting Depends and Conflicts and as we can't create them out of thin air the cache generation needs to be involved so we end up writing a Packages file which we want to parse – after we have parsed the other Packages files already. With .dsc/.deb files we could add them before we started parsing anything. With a bit of care we can avoid generating too much data we have to throw away again (as many parts assume that e.g. the count of packages doesn't change midair), so that on a speed front there shouldn't be much of a difference, but output can be slightly confusing as if we have a completely valid cache on disk the "Reading package lists... Done" is printed two times – but apt is pretty quick about it in that case. Closes: #137560, #444930, #489911, #583914, #728317, #812173
2016-01-25use consistently the last : as name:arch separatorDavid Kalnischkies
Proper debian packages do not contain ':' in the package name, so for real packages this is a non-issue, but apt itself frequently makes use of packages with such an illegal name for internal proposes. Git-Dch: Ignore
2016-01-25always create pkg at the time pkg:arch is createdDavid Kalnischkies
To resolve dependencies like "pkg:arch" we create a package with the name "pkg:arch" and the architecture "any". We create these packages only if a dependency needs it as these kind of dependencies aren't that common. This commit ensured that in the even this architecture specific dependency is the only relation this package has we still create the underlying package to have them available in provides resolution.
2016-01-23Remap another (non-parameter) StringViewJulian Andres Klode
I only looked at parameters in the previous commit, which was not enough: One place also generated local string views. In this case, we only need to make ArchA dynamic, as NameA is not used after the FindPkg() call. Gbp-Dch: ignore
2016-01-23Remap StringView instances pointing into the cacheJulian Andres Klode
It turns out that StringViews might need to be remapped in some places because they come from the cache. For example, some sites pass a Ver.VerStr() to NewProvides(). Such a StringView would become invalid during the duration of the call if the cache is remapped, causing the program to die with a segmentation fault. We can take care of those issues by remapping string views in the same way we remap all the iterators. String views are only remapped if they point into the cache though, this allows us to write more generic code on the callee site without having to check whether the view points into the cache or not. That's not as efficient as possible, but the overhead does not appear to be measurable. Closes: #812251
2016-01-23Pass the old map size to ReMap()Julian Andres Klode
This allows us to check if a value to be remapped was inside the cache or not, which will become useful at a later point. Gbp-Dch: ignore
2016-01-14fix M-A:foreign provides creation for unknown archsDavid Kalnischkies
Architectures for packages which do not belong to the native nor a foreign architecture (dubbed barbarian for now) which are marked M-A:foreign still provide in their own architecture even if not for others. Also, other M-A:foreign (and allowed) packages provide in these barbarian architectures.
2016-01-08Store the size of strings in the cacheJulian Andres Klode
By storing the size of the string in the cache, we can make use of it when comparing the names in the hashtable in pkgCache::FindGrp.
2016-01-08pkgCacheGenerator: CurMd5.Value() cannot be emptyJulian Andres Klode
It makes no sense to check if the value is empty, as it cannot be. It will always be a hexstring of exactly 32 bytes.
2016-01-08pkgCacheGenerator::StoreString: Get rid of std::stringJulian Andres Klode
Instead of storing a string -> map_stringitem_t mapping, create our own data type that can point to either a normal string or a string inside the cache. This avoids the creation of any string and improves performance slightly (about 4%).
2016-01-08Replace compare() == 0 checks with this == other checksJulian Andres Klode
This improves performance, as we now can ignore unequal strings based on their length already. Gbp-Dch: ignore
2016-01-08pkgCacheGenerator: Use StringView for toStringJulian Andres Klode
This removes some minor overhead. Gbp-Dch: ignore
2016-01-08pkgCacheGenerator::StoreString: Move the string into the mapJulian Andres Klode
Moving the string is likely faster than copying it. We could probably avoid strings alltogether in the future using some more crazy code, but I have not looked at that yet. Gbp-Dch: ignore
2016-01-07Switch performance critical code to use APT::StringViewJulian Andres Klode
This improves performance of the cache generation on my ARM platform (4x Cortex A15) by about 10% to 20% from 2.35-2.50 to 2.1 seconds.
2015-12-29Do not sync the cache fileJulian Andres Klode
Integrity is taken care of by the checksum now.
2015-12-29Add support for calculating hashes over the entire cacheJulian Andres Klode
2015-12-29pkgCacheGenerator: Allow passing down an already created cacheJulian Andres Klode
If we already have opened a cache, there is no point in having to open it again.
2015-12-27pkgcachegen: Use std::unordered_map instead of std::mapJulian Andres Klode
std::unordered_map is faster than std::map in our use case, reducing cache generation time by about 10% in my benchmark.
2015-11-27add messages to our deprecation warnings in libaptDavid Kalnischkies
Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-11-20do not segfault in cache generation on mmap failureDavid Kalnischkies
Out of memory and similar circumstanzas could cause MMap::Map to fail and especially the mmap/malloc calls in it. With some additional checking we can avoid segfaults and similar in such situations – at least in theory as if this is a real out of memory everything we do to handle the error could just as well run into a memory problem as well… But at least in theory (if MMap::Map is made to fail always) we can deal with it so good that a user actually never sees a failure (as the cache it tries to load with it fails and is discarded, so that DynamicMMap takes over and a new one is build) instead of segfaulting. Closes: 803417
2015-11-05apply various suggestions made by cppcheckDavid Kalnischkies
Reported-By: cppcheck Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-09-14do not ignore differently versioned self-providesDavid Kalnischkies
Reported-By: Konomi on IRC
2015-09-14avoid using global PendingError to avoid failing too often too soonDavid Kalnischkies
Our error reporting is historically grown into some kind of mess. A while ago I implemented stacking for the global error which is used in this commit now to wrap calls to functions which do not report (all) errors via return, so that only failures in those calls cause a failure to propergate down the chain rather than failing if anything (potentially totally unrelated) has failed at some point in the past. This way we can avoid stopping the entire acquire process just because a single source produced an error for example. It also means that after the acquire process the cache is generated – even if the acquire process had failures – as we still have the old good data around we can and should generate a cache for (again). There are probably more instances of this hiding, but all these looked like the easiest to work with and fix with reasonable (aka net-positive) effects.
2015-09-14implement dpkgs vision of interpreting pkg:<arch> dependenciesDavid Kalnischkies
How the Multi-Arch field and pkg:<arch> dependencies interact was discussed at DebConf15 in the "MultiArch BoF". dpkg and apt (among other tools like dose) had a different interpretation in certain scenarios which we resolved by agreeing on dpkg view – and this commit realizes this agreement in code. As was the case so far libapt sticks to the idea of trying to hide MultiArch as much as possible from individual frontends and instead translates it to good old SingleArch. There are certainly situations which can be improved in frontends if they know that MultiArch is upon them, but these are improvements – not necessary changes needed to unbreak a frontend. The implementation idea is simple: If we parse a dependency on foo:amd64 the dependency is formed on a package 'foo:amd64' of arch 'any'. This package is provided by package 'foo' of arch 'amd64', but not by 'foo' of arch 'i386'. Both of those foo packages provide each other through (assuming foo is M-A:foreign) to allow a dependency on 'foo' to be satisfied by either foo of amd64 or i386. Packages can also declare to provide 'foo:amd64' which is translated to providing 'foo:amd64:any' as well. This indirection over provides was chosen as the alternative would be to teach dependency resolvers how to deal with architecture specific dependencies – which violates the design idea of avoiding resolver changes, especially as architecture-specific dependencies are a cornercase with quite a few subtil rules. Handling it all over versioned provides as we already did for M-A in general seems much simpler as it just works for them. This switch to :any has actually a "surprising" benefit as well: Even frontends showing a package name via .Name() [which doesn't show the architecture] will display the "architecture" for dependencies in which it was explicitely requested, while we will not show the 'strange' :any arch in FullName(true) [= pretty-print] either. Before you had to specialcase these and by default you wouldn't get these details shown. The only identifiable disadvantage is that this complicates error reporting and handling. apt-get's ShowBroken has existing problems with virtual packages [it just shows the name without any reason], so that has to be worked on eventually. The other case is that detecting if a package is completely unknown or if it was at least referenced somewhere needs to acount for this "split" – not that it makes a practical difference which error is shown… but its one of the improvements possible.
2015-08-27ignore AllowMem parameter in cache generationDavid Kalnischkies
The parameter name suggests that it should forbid the building of the entire cache in memory, but this isn't how it was previously and as AllowMem is false by default it actually prevents previous usecases from working like being root and configuring apt to build no caches at all. This should be fixed at some point to actually work, but that is hard to pull off as it means switching the default and some callers (including apt itself) actually did call it explicitly with false in certain cases for no apparent reason (at least now where it is common to have enough memory to throw at every problem and even if not is a slow apt usally better than an apt erroring out). Closes: 796459
2015-08-27Fix more instances of missing remapping handlingJulian Andres Klode
After fixing Bug#796999, we noticed that there were some more instances of iterators which had no associated Dynamic object, causing them to not be updated when the cache was remapped. This happened in two places: In NewPackage() and in NewProvidesAllArch(). Gbp-Dch: ignore
2015-08-27pkgcachegen: Account for remapping when parsing depends from NewPackageJulian Andres Klode
In both the Ver and Dep variables, we need to account for remapping, as otherwise we would still reference the old bug. Reproduction environment: * An i386 system with amd64 foreign architecture * A sources.list with deb http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20150826T102846Z/ unstable main deb http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20150826T102846Z/ experimental main Thanks: Jakub Wilk for the bug report and the backtraces Closes: #796999
2015-08-17Cleanup includes after running iwyuMichael Vogt
2015-08-13Deprecate SPtrArray<T> and convert everyone to unique_ptr<T[]>Julian Andres Klode
More standardization
2015-08-13Mark SPtr as deprecated, and convert users to std::unique_ptrJulian Andres Klode
Switch to std::unique_ptr, as this is safer than SPtr.
2015-08-11Drop C++11 elements from headersJulian Andres Klode
2015-08-10drop obsolete explicit :none handling in pkgCacheGenDavid Kalnischkies
We archieve the same without the special handling now, so drop this code. Makes supporting this abdomination a little longer bearable as well. Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-08-10eliminate dead file-provides code in cache generationDavid Kalnischkies
The code was never active in production, it just sits there collecting dust and given that it is never tested probably doesn't even work anymore the way it was supposed to be (whatever that was exactly in the first place). So just remove it before I have to "fix" it again next time. Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-08-10elimate duplicated code in pkgIndexFile subclassesDavid Kalnischkies
Trade deduplication of code for a bunch of new virtuals, so it is actually visible how the different indexes behave cleaning up the interface at large in the process. Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-08-10add volatile sources support in libapt-pkgDavid Kalnischkies
Sources are usually defined in sources.list (and co) and are pretty stable, but once in a while a frontend might want to add an additional "source" like a local .deb file to install this package (No support for 'real' sources being added this way as this is a multistep process). We had a hack in place to allow apt-get and apt to pull this of for a short while now, but other frontends are either left in the cold by this and/or the code for it looks dirty with FIXMEs plastering it and has on top of this also some problems (like including these 'volatile' sources in the srcpkgcache.bin file). So the biggest part in this commit is actually the rewrite of the cache generation as it is now potentially a three step process. The biggest problem with adding support now through is that this makes a bunch of previously mostly unusable by externs and therefore hidden classes public, so a bit of further tuneing on this now public API is in order…
2015-08-10just-in-time creation for (explicit) negative depsDavid Kalnischkies
Now that we deal with provides in a more dynamic fashion the last remaining problem is explicit dependencies like 'Conflicts: foo' which have to apply to all architectures, but creating them all at the same time requires us to know all architectures ending up in the cache which isn't needed to be the same set as all foreign architectures. The effect is visible already now through as this prevents the creation of a bunch of virtual packages for arch:all packages and as such also many dependencies, just not very visible if you don't look at the stats… Git-Dch Ignore
2015-08-10just-in-time creation for (implicit) ProvidesDavid Kalnischkies
Expecting the worst is easy to code, but has its disadvantages e.g. by creating package structures which otherwise would have never existed. By creating the provides instead at the time a package structure is added we are well prepared for the introduction of partial architectures, massive amounts of M-A:foreign (and :allowed) and co as far as provides are concerned at least. We have something relatively similar for dependencies already. Many tests are added for both M-A states and the code cleaned to properly support implicit provides for foreign architectures and architectures we 'just' happen to parse. Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-08-10hide implicit deps in apt-cache again by defaultDavid Kalnischkies
Before MultiArch implicits weren't a thing, so they were hidden by default by definition. Adding them for MultiArch solved many problems, but having no reliable way of detecting which dependency (and provides) is implicit or not causes problems everytime we want to output dependencies without confusing our observers with unneeded implementation details. The really notworthy point here is actually that we keep now a better record of how a dependency came to be so that we can later reason about it more easily, but that is hidden so deep down in the library internals that change is more the problems it solves than the change itself.
2015-08-10link DependencyData structs togetherDavid Kalnischkies
Cache generation needs a way of quickly iterating over the unique potion of the dependencies to be able to share them. By linking them together we can reduce the speed penality (~ 80%) with only a small reduction in saved size (~ 20%). Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-08-10split-up Dependency structDavid Kalnischkies
Having dependency data separated from the link between version/package and the dependency allows use to work on sharing the depdency data a bit as it turns out that many dependencies are in fact duplicates. How many are duplicates various heavily with the sources configured, but for a single Debian release the ballpark is 2 duplicates for each dependency already (e.g. libc6 counts 18410 dependencies, but only 45 unique). Add more releases and the duplicates count only rises to get ~6 for 3 releases. For each architecture a user has configured which given the shear number of dependencies amounts to MBs of duplication. We can cut down on this number, but pay a heavy price for it: In my many releases(3) + architectures(3) test we have a 10% (~ 0.5 sec) increase in cache creationtime, but also 10% less cachesize (~ 10 MB). Further work is needed to rip the whole benefits from this through, so this is just the start. Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-08-10make all d-pointer * const pointersDavid Kalnischkies
Doing this disables the implicit copy assignment operator (among others) which would cause hovac if used on the classes as it would just copy the pointer, not the data the d-pointer points to. For most of the classes we don't need a copy assignment operator anyway and in many classes it was broken before as many contain a pointer of some sort. Only for our Cacheset Container interfaces we define an explicit copy assignment operator which could later be implemented to copy the data from one d-pointer to the other if we need it. Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-06-16add d-pointer, virtual destructors and de-inline de/constructorsDavid Kalnischkies
To have a chance to keep the ABI for a while we need all three to team up. One of them missing and we might loose, so ensuring that they are available is a very tedious but needed task once in a while. Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-06-15populate the Architecture field for PackageFilesDavid Kalnischkies
This is mainly visible in the policy, so that you can now pin by b= and let it only effect Packages files of this architecture and hence the packages coming from it (which do not need to be from this architecture, but very likely are in a normal repository setup). If you should pin by architecture in this way is a different question… Closes: 687255
2015-06-15implement default apt-get file --release-info modeDavid Kalnischkies
Selecting targets based on the Release they belong to isn't to unrealistic. In fact, it is assumed to be the most used case so it is made the default especially as this allows to bundle another thing we have to be careful with: Filenames and only showing targets we have acquired. Closes: 752702
2015-06-12store Release files data in the CacheDavid Kalnischkies
We used to read the Release file for each Packages file and store the data in the PackageFile struct even through potentially many Packages (and Translation-*) files could use the same data. The point of the exercise isn't the duplicated data through. Having the Release files as first-class citizens in the Cache allows us to properly track their state as well as allows us to use the information also for files which aren't in the cache, but where we know to which Release file they belong (Sources are an example for this). This modifies the pkgCache structs, especially the PackagesFile struct which depending on how libapt users access the data in these structs can mean huge breakage or no visible change. As a single data point: aptitude seems to be fine with this. Even if there is breakage it is trivial to fix in a backportable way while avoiding breakage for everyone would be a huge pain for us. Note that not all PackageFile structs have a corresponding ReleaseFile. In particular the dpkg/status file as well as *.deb files have not. As these have only a Archive property need, the Component property takes over this duty and the ReleaseFile remains zero. This is also the reason why it isn't needed nor particularily recommended to change from PackagesFile to ReleaseFile blindly. Sticking with the earlier is usually the better option.