| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
pkgAcq{DiffIndex,IndexMerge,pkgAcqBaseIndex, pkgAcqIndex}
|
|
If one of the pkgAcqIndex{,Merge}Diffs fails, they will run
pkgAcqIndex() which needs the IndexTarget/indexRecords data.
So we pass it along.
|
|
|
|
debian/experimental
Conflicts:
apt-pkg/deb/debindexfile.cc
apt-pkg/deb/debindexfile.h
apt-pkg/deb/debsrcrecords.cc
|
|
debian/experimental
|
|
|
|
bugfix/update-progress-reporting
|
|
APT_PKG_MINOR < 13)
|
|
|
|
debian/experimental
|
|
debian/experimental
|
|
debian/sid
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
apt-pkg/cachefilter.h
apt-pkg/contrib/fileutl.cc
apt-pkg/contrib/netrc.h
apt-pkg/deb/debsrcrecords.cc
apt-pkg/init.h
apt-pkg/pkgcache.cc
debian/apt.install.in
debian/changelog
|
|
about a good API
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closes: 746434
|
|
gcc reports in testcase ./test-bug-596498-trusted-unsigned-repo:
apt-pkg/acquire-item.cc:1059:7: runtime error: load of value 234, which
is not a valid value for type 'bool'
This happens as the bool Verify is initialized only in one of the two
constructors of the pkgAcqIndex class. It isn't a problem through as the
verification controlled by this flag is optional and used to fail early
on garbage files (like network portal pages) instead of later on in the
hashsum verification or while parsing (the then untrusted) file.
Reported-By: gcc-4.9 -fsanitize=undefined
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
test/libapt/fileutl_test.cc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gzip only gives us 32bit of size, storing it in a 64bit container and
doing a 32bit flip on it has therefore unintended results.
So we just go with a exact size container and let the flipping be handled
by eglibc provided le32toh removing our #ifdef machinery.
Closes: 745866
|
|
The bugreport highlights the problem with an empty package name. We fix
this by 'ignoring' these so that it behaves just like "apt-get install".
The deeper problem is that modifier strings can be longer than a package
name in which case the comparison doesn't make sense, so don't compare
then. Was not noticed so far as all modifiers are of length 1, so the
only package name shorter than this is in fact the empty package name.
Closes: 744940
|
|
In bug #740673 various issues in the CD-ROM handling code were
identified, while most the issues ended up being fixed in another way,
the unmounting of the CD-ROM in error cases was not tackled so far.
(The patch was modified by the commiter to apply)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used to create a proper pkgAcqIndex() with size information
|
|
for both items and bytes
|
|
fetcher
|
|
fseek and co do this to their eof-flags and it is more logic this way as
we will usually seek away from the end (e.g. to re-read the file).
The commit also improves the testcase further and adds a test for the
binary compressor codepath (as gz, bzip2 and xz are handled by
libraries) via the use of 'rev' as a 'compressor'.
|
|
with the correct extension
|
|
progress information
|
|
|
|
We always reacted on the size change, but the bar is only redraw if the
precentage changes, which can take quiet a while in big upgrades, so
with a bit of refactoring we can now call for a redraw immediate to fix
this.
This refactor also helps in avoiding obscure pitfalls clangs static
analyser was complaining about (namely failure of ioctl resulting in
garbage values in the struct).
|
|
A package which can't be downloaded anymore is very likely dropped from
a release and can therefore no longer be 'standard' (or similar). We
therefore do not grant points for them anymore and demote them to
prio:extra instead which helps other packages breaking them away even if
they have a lower priority.
The testcase was initially created by Michael Vogt and just amended.
|
|
As the comment actually says: open() does the umask dance by itself, so
we don't need to do it for it. We have to do it after mkstemp in Atomic
though, so move it into the if.
Also removes the "micro-optimisation" "FilePermissions == 600" as it
doesn't trigger at the moment anyway as 600 != 0600.
|
|
FileFd::Read already deals with the increase of the skipposition so that
we as the caller in FileFd::Skip really shouldn't increase it, too.
|
|
FileFd code knows how to deal with such a compressor, so it isn't a
problem, but it is absolutely not needed as we already have an
(matching) identity compressor with '.' earlier in the list.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
The explicit listing is a pain every time you want to add a file to the
list and serves no propose as we list all files there anyway, so this is
not only easier but also documents this fact.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
|
|
Bug lp:#1304657 was caused by confusion around the name Perms.
The new name AccessMode should make it clear that its not the
literal file permissions but instead the AccessMode passed to
open() (i.e. the umask needs to be applied)
|
|
Commit 7335eebea6dd43581d4650a8818b06383ab89901 introduced a bug
that caused FileFd to create insecure permissions when FileFd::Atomic
is used. This commit fixes the permissions and adds a test.
The bug is most likely caused by the confusing "Perm" parameter
that is passed to Open() - its not the file permissions but intead
the "mode" part of open/creat.
|
