| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
There is no point in trying to perform Write/Read on a FileFd which
already failed as they aren't going to work as expected, so we should
make sure that they fail early on and hard.
(cherry picked from commit 02c38073af51802c02bb104d4450e0e112d641ad)
|
|
Reported-By: cppcheck
Gbp-Dch: Ignore
(cherry picked from commit 196d590a99e309764e07c9dc23ea98897eebf53a)
|
|
If another file in the transaction fails and hence dooms the transaction
we can end in a situation in which a -patched file (= rred writes the
result of the patching to it) remains in the partial/ directory.
The next apt call will perform the rred patching again and write its
result again to the -patched file, but instead of starting with an empty
file as intended it will override the content previously in the file
which has the same result if the new content happens to be longer than
the old content, but if it isn't parts of the old content remain in the
file which will pass verification as the new content written to it
matches the hashes and if the entire transaction passes the file will be
moved the lists/ directory where it might or might not trigger errors
depending on if the old content which remained forms a valid file
together with the new content.
This has no real security implications as no untrusted data is involved:
The old content consists of a base file which passed verification and a
bunch of patches which all passed multiple verifications as well, so the
old content isn't controllable by an attacker and the new one isn't
either (as the new content alone passes verification). So the best an
attacker can do is letting the user run into the same issue as in the
report.
Closes: #831762
(cherry picked from commit 0e071dfe205ad21d8b929b4bb8164b008dc7c474)
|
|
We read the entire input file we want to patch anyhow, so we can also
calculate the hash for that file and compare it with what he had
expected it to be.
Note that this isn't really a security improvement as a) the file we
patch is trusted & b) if the input is incorrect, the result will hardly be
matching, so this is just for failing slightly earlier with a more
relevant error message (althrough, in terms of rred its ignored and
complete download attempt instead).
(cherry picked from commit 6e71ec6fcdcaa926c98fa58cd4af38e42556df15)
|
|
The flush call is a no-op in most FileFd implementations so this isn't
as critical as it might sound as the only non-trivial implementation is
in the buffered writer, which tends not be used to buffer another
buffer…
(cherry picked from commit 8ca481e8419c19b6ef9074b68cc028177a507161)
|
|
If we don't give a specific error to report up it is likely that all
error currently in the error stack are equally important, so reporting
just one could turn out to be confusing e.g. if name resolution failed
in a SRV record list.
(cherry picked from commit b50dfa6b2dd2d459e0c2746ac9367982b96ffac0)
|
|
If we have files in partial/ from a previous invocation or similar such
those could be symlinks created by file:// sources. The code is
expecting only real files through and happily changes owner,
modification times and permission on the file the symlink points to
which tend to be files we have no business in touching in this way.
Permissions of symlinks shouldn't be changed, changing owner is usually
pointless to, but just to be sure we pick the easy way out and use
lchown, check for symlinks before chmod/utimes.
Reported-By: Mattia Rizzolo on IRC
(cherry picked from commit 3465138575e1fd0d5892d9b6be1ae232eb873460)
|
|
As the volatile sources are parsed last they were sorted behind the
dpkg/status file and hence are treated as a downgrade, which isn't
really what you want to happen as from a user POV its an upgrade.
(cherry picked from commit cb9ac09bd6a36e73c2dce1d529acde6e4d15e32d)
|
|
If we have a (e.g. locally built) deb file installed and do try to
install it again apt complained about this being a downgrade, but it
wasn't as it is the very same version… it was just confused into not
merging the versions together which looks like a downgrade then.
The same size assumption is usually good, but given that volatile files
are parsed last (even after the status file) the base assumption no
longer holds, but is easy to adept without actually changing anything in
practice.
(cherry picked from commit e7edb2fef8370d54a4b8e5a01266e6eda81ef84e)
|
|
Traditionally all providers are protected providing something as apt
can't know which of them is actually really providing the functionality
for the user ensuring that we don't propose the removal of used stuff,
but that is of course also keeping stuff around which could be removed.
That can cause the collection of multiple old providers until the
provided package is itself no longer needed (e.g. out-of-tree kernel
modules). We combat this by marking providers only from the newest
source package version so that old providers built by older versions of
the same source package can be garbage collected.
(cherry picked from commit a0ed43f7323b9d7976ed0ba8d437a42e24af9eaf)
|
|
As the previous commit, this shouldn't change behavior at all, but
beside being more explicit and perhaps faster its also considerably
shorter (granted, mostly by if0-block elimination).
Gbp-Dch: Ignore
(cherry picked from commit 5a3339db48479114a0e1e11ebc8d640eb3e49933)
|
|
Piling everything in a single if statement always made my head wobble,
but it hasn't even a benefit as the most common case of a package which
isn't installed passes all of the old if and lands in the non-existent
else-part of the inner if. So beside a subjective cleanup of what goes
on this implementation should also be a bit faster.
No change in behavior should be present.
Gbp-Dch: Ignore
(cherry picked from commit 769e9f3ea1cbe67d3b98e6db6c956abde2384868)
|
|
The old prettyprinters have only access to the struct they pretty print,
which isn't enough usually as we want to know for a package also a bit
of state information like which version is the candidate.
We therefore need to pull the DepCache into context and hence use a
temporary struct which is printed instead of the iterator itself.
(cherry picked from commit 84573326f41dd09b914b8374548e7ee7c93d0439)
|
|
Writing first means that even in the event of a power-failure the
autobit is saved for future processing instead of "forgotten" so that
the package is treated as manually installed.
In some cases we have to re-run the writing after dpkg is done through
as dpkg can let packages disappear and in such cases apt will move
autobits around (or in that case non-autobits) which we need to store.
(cherry picked from commit 309f497b7280a45e3626493318adb6d39ba5c69b)
|
|
If we can't read the old file we can't just move forward as that would
discard potentially discard old data (especially other fields). We let
it fail only after we are done writing the new file so a user has the
chance to look into and merge the new data (which is otherwise
discarded).
(cherry picked from commit 520931867ee2fac8415a624204414d3b62550996)
|
|
We deploy atomic renames for some files, but these renames also happen
if something about the file failed which isn't really the point of the
exercise…
Closes: 828908
(cherry picked from commit fc5db01bb7d1546944200d197866b0b5c378f100)
|
|
Needed for the previous change
(cherry picked from commit 33aa2752e7c7a6f0a01b191111aa35a5fe69cf20)
|
|
If a package file is formatted in a way that that no space
follows a deprecated "<", we would reformat it to "<=" and
increase the length of the output by 1, which can break.
Under normal circumstances with "<=" this should not be an
issue.
Closes: #828812
(cherry picked from commit b6e9756ca03ec887ef1d0bc8e38f63c29db7a365)
|
|
Filesize is a silly hash all by itself, but in combination with others
it can be a strong opponent, so ensuring that it is in the list of
hashes and hence checked by the normal course of action the acquire
process takes is a good thing.
(cherry picked from commit 5da51e0e2da3f055306562d38103b06a23d81719)
|
|
Regression introduced in 8f858d560e3b7b475c623c4e242d1edce246025a.
Commands are probably better of always having output through as the
fall through to the generic proxy settings is likely not intended. As
documenting and implementing this more consistently is kind of a
regression through, it is split off into the next commit.
Closes: 827713
(cherry picked from commit cad1877559f3e1703c3fea4d081978e1b4bb4a0e)
|
|
Just closing the fd would be enough, but while we are at it we can also
use the Popen interface to have an easier time with this.
(cherry picked from commit 8f858d560e3b7b475c623c4e242d1edce246025a)
|
|
Seen first in #826783, but as this buglog also shows leaked uncompressed
files as well we don't close it just yet.
(cherry picked from commit 6f35be91c9e86e463bca7df6eadf05412c7b732c)
|
|
This effects only compressors configured on the fly (rather then the
inbuilt ones as they use a library).
(cherry picked from commit bdc42211700ef0f6f40e4ef3f362e52d684d70fb)
|
|
Setting the C++ locale via std::locale::global(std::locale("")); which
would otherwise default to the default C locale (aka: unaffected by
setlocale) effects the formatting of numeric types in IO streams, which
for output for humans is perfectly sensible, but breaks our many text
interfaces used and parsed by us and others without expecting the
numbers to be formatted.
Closes: #825396
(cherry picked from commit b58e2c7c56b1416a343e81f9f80cb1f02c128e25)
|
|
The report mentions "apt list --upgradable", but there are others which
have inconsistent behavior ranging from segfaulting to doing something
with the partial (and hence incomplete) data. We had a recent report
about sources.list (#818628), this one mentions prefences, the obvious
next step is conf files… so the testcase is adapted to check for all
three in file and directory versions and run a bunch of commands each
time which should all have more or less the same behavior in such a case
(aka error out).
Closes: 824503
(cherry picked from commit fdf9eef4d96a18d0167708499c993e1174251e88)
|
|
Using Pkg.CandVersion() here is wrong as its implementation will return
a candidate based just on the default policy settings ignoring user
preferences and otherwise set candidates (aka: it sidesteps the
pkgDepCache).
This causes M-A:same libraries to be detected as screwed even through
they aren't, so that they end up being kept back.
Reported-By: Felipe Sateler on IRC
|
|
Failures can happen and APT regardless will do a partial cache
update anyway. Because APT ensures that the list directory is
in a sane state, it makes sense to also call success hooks if
success was only partial - otherwise it loses sync with APT.
Most importantly, this causes the appstream cache to be empty,
see launchpad bug #1562733.
This is somewhat overly optimistic though: As soon as any repository
has nonexisting optional files, the missing optional files are also
treated as success, which means a single broken repository without an
InRelease file still runs Success hooks, even though it really should
not.
(cherry picked from commit 35664152e47a1d4d712fd52e0f0a2dc8ed359d32)
|
|
Versions which are only available in dpkg/status aren't installable and
apt doesn't pick them as candidate for this reason – for the same reason
such packages shouldn't be sent to an external solver via EDSP. The
packages are pinned to -1, but if the solver has strict pinning disabled
it could end up picking this version anyhow – which is a request apt can
not satisfy.
Reported-By: Maximiliano Curia <maxy@debian.org> on IRC
(cherry picked from commit 33190fe3d3c200dcd417cd336f9db11f5f4408d5)
|
|
Broken in a4b8112b19763cbd2c12b81d55bc7d43a591d610.
If an item has a description which includes no space and is redirected
to another mirror the code which wants to rewrite the description
expects a space in there, but can't find it and the unguarded substr
command on the string will fail with an exception thrown…
Guarding it properly and everything is fine.
(cherry picked from commit 84ac6edfabe1c92d67e8d441e04216ad33c89165)
|
|
Daniel Kahn Gillmor highlights in the bugreport that security isn't
improving by having the user import additional keys – especially as
importing keys securely is hard.
The bugreport was initially about dropping the warning to a notice, but
in given the previously mentioned observation and the fact that we
weren't printing a warning (or a notice) for expired or revoked keys
providing a signature we drop it completely as the code to display a
message if this was the only key is in another path – and is considered
critical.
Closes: 618445
(Backported from commit fb7b11ebb852fa255053ecab605bc9cfe9de0603)
|
|
Redesign of multivalue options in 463c8d801595ce5ac94d7c032264820be7434232
caused the parser to look for <multivalue>{Add,Remove} (no hyphen)
instead of the expected <multivalue>-{Add,Remove}.
(cherry picked from commit f5585106d61b381c9dcf8f1dd48c742dc68f6c81)
|
|
Tested via (newly) empty index files, but effects also files dropped
from the repository or an otherwise changed repository config.
|
|
There is just no point in taking the time to acquire empty files –
especially as it will be tiny non-empty compressed files usually.
|
|
A silly of-by-one error in the stripping of the extension to check for
the uncompressed filename broken in an attempt to support all
compressions in commit a09f6eb8fc67cd2d836019f448f18580396185e5.
Fixing this highlights also mistakes in the handling of the Alt-Filename
in libapt which would cause apt to remove the file from the repository
(if root has the needed rights – aka the disk isn't readonly or similar)
|
|
Regression introduced in commit 590f1923121815b36ef889033c1c416a23cbe9a2
(2011!) causing apt to not check if Pre-Depends are satisfied before
calling --configure. This managed to hide so perfectly well for years as
Pre-Depends aren't that common, apt prefers upgrading these packages
first and checks for satisfaction is already in SmartUnpack, so there
is only a small window of oppertunity to break a pre-dependency relation
(usually with an unpack).
Verified by logchecking with two provided status files in the buglog.
I would have liked to write a test, but I wasn't able to reach the needed
complexity to get apt to fail – but the change is small and reasonable,
so what could possible go wrong™, right?
LP: #1569099
|
|
It handy to be able to point apt at reading a compressed dpkg/status
file in debugging cases, which worked pre-1.1 but somewhere down the
line in the massive refactoring. Restoring this behavior in a central
place for all realfile index files instead of just for the status file.
(This has no effect on index files acquired from an archive – those are
handled by different classes and support compressed files just fine)
|
|
There is a good chance that the attempt will fail, but if a user
mentions certain packages explicitly on the commandline there is a
chance that this will consist of a broken system which is resolved
by upgrading more packages then just the mentioned.
This limitation was not effecting external resolvers.
|
|
With the previous commit we track the state of transactions, so we can
now use our knowledge to avoid processing data for a transaction which
was already closed (via an abort in this case).
This is needed as multiple independent processes are interacting in the
process, so there isn't a simple immediate full-engine stop and it would
also be bad to teach each and every item how to check if its manager
has failed subordinate and what to do in that case.
In the pdiff case, which deals (potentially) with many items during its
lifetime e.g. a hashsum mismatch in another file can abort the
transaction the file we try to patch via pdiff belongs to. This causes
some of the items (which are already done) to be aborted with it, but
items still in the process of acquisition continue in the processing and
will later try to use all the items together failing in strange ways as
cleanup already happened.
The chosen solution is to dry up the communication channels instead by
ignoring new requests for data acquisition, canceling requests which are
not assigned to a queue and not calling Done/Failed on items anymore.
This means that e.g. already started or pending (e.g. pipelined)
downloads aren't stopped and continue as normal for now, but they remain
in partial/ and aren't processed further so the next update command will
pick them up and put them to good use while the current process fails
updating (for this transaction group) in an orderly fashion.
Closes: 817240
Thanks: Barr Detwix & Vincent Lefevre for log files
|
|
We want to keep track of the state of a transaction overall to base
future decisions on it, but as a pre-requirement we have to make sure
that a transaction isn't commited twice (which happened if the download
of InRelease failed and Release takes over).
It also happened to create empty commits after a transaction was already
aborted in cases in which the Release files were rejected.
This isn't effecting security at the moment, but to ensure this isn't
happening again and can never be bad a bunch of fatal error messages are
added to make regressions on this front visible.
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
Reported-By: gcc -fsanitize=address
|
|
Hardly noticeable, but given that we have the option to easily enable
it, lets enable it as every newline in the message is written
individually by the code.
|
|
Some methods had it missing, some used the keyword directly, which isn't
a problem as it is a cc file, but for consistency lets stick to our
macro for now.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Introduces APT::Hashes::<NAME> with entries Untrusted and Weak
which can be set to true to cause the hash to be treated as
untrusted and/or weak.
|
|
If the package is marked for removal, keep it marked for
removal and do not mark it for keep. If we mark it for keep,
we some how later get to a different stage where it is marked
for unpack instead of removal.
In the example in the bug report, we would get a:
SmartUnPack maas-region-controller-min:amd64 (replace version 2.0.0~alpha3+bzr4810-0ubuntu1 with Segmentation fault
maas-region-controller-min:amd64 was marked for removal, but
we changed it to keep and somehow it thinks that this is to
be replaced now instead of removed (probably because the
InstallVer != CandidateVer [with InstallVer = 0]).
This fixes a regression introduced in release 1.2.7, commit:
0390edd5452b081f8efcf412f96d535a1d959457
Reported-by: LaMont Jones on IRC
LP: #1562402
|
|
|
|
This avoids templates using StringView to be exported, such as
std::vector<StringView*>::emplace_back().
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
There is really no need to have the same code three times.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Otherwise, things will just start failing later down the stack,
because (a) the lazy getters do not check if building was successful
and (b) any further getter call would return the invalid object
anyway.
Also initialize VS in pkgCache to nullptr by default.
Closes: #818628
|
|
The epoch stripping in this code is done since day one, but in other
places we show a version epochs are not stripped. If epochs are present
in packages they tend to be an important information which we can't just
drop and especially can't drop "sometimes" as that confuses users and
tools alike – so even if removing code in use for (close to) 18 years
feels wrong, it is probably the right choice for consistency.
Closes: 818162
|
|
This makes the new GPG related warnings much nicer to read,
for example, the second one here replaces the first one:
W: gpgv:/var/lib/apt/lists/example.com_dists_stable_InRelease: Weak ...
W: http://example.com/dists/stable/InRelease: Weak ...
|
