Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
While Target{,-Add,-Remove} is available for configuring IndexTargets
already, allow Targets to be mentioned explicitely as yes/no options as
well, so that the Target 'Contents' can be disabled via 'Contents: no'
as well as 'Target-Remove: Contents'.
|
|
Sometimes too much refactoring can have bad effects.
Thanks: Niels Thykier for reporting on IRC
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
First of, the temporary directory we download the changelog to needs to
be owned by _apt, but that also means that we don't need to check if we
could/should drop privs as the download happens to a dedicated tempdir
and only after that it is moved to its final location by a privileged user.
|
|
Reported-By: codespell
|
|
The parameter name suggests that it should forbid the building of the
entire cache in memory, but this isn't how it was previously and as
AllowMem is false by default it actually prevents previous usecases from
working like being root and configuring apt to build no caches at all.
This should be fixed at some point to actually work, but that is hard to
pull off as it means switching the default and some callers (including
apt itself) actually did call it explicitly with false in certain
cases for no apparent reason (at least now where it is common to have
enough memory to throw at every problem and even if not is a slow apt
usally better than an apt erroring out).
Closes: 796459
|
|
Fetched() was reported for mostly nothing, while we should be calling it
for files worked with from non-local sources (e.g. http, but not file or
xz). Previously this was called from an acquire item, but got moved to
the acquire worker instead to avoid having it (re)implemented in all
items, but the checks were faulty.
|
|
We deal with Conflicts in SmartUnpack in pretty much the same way, but
Breaks weren't handled in SmartConfigure so that the remove was sheduled
after the configuration of the package breaking the to-be-removed.
Closes: 796070
|
|
After fixing Bug#796999, we noticed that there were
some more instances of iterators which had no associated
Dynamic object, causing them to not be updated when
the cache was remapped.
This happened in two places: In NewPackage() and in
NewProvidesAllArch().
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
In both the Ver and Dep variables, we need to account for remapping,
as otherwise we would still reference the old bug.
Reproduction environment:
* An i386 system with amd64 foreign architecture
* A sources.list with
deb http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20150826T102846Z/ unstable main
deb http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20150826T102846Z/ experimental main
Thanks: Jakub Wilk for the bug report and the backtraces
Closes: #796999
|
|
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
|
|
Also add "Debug::Acquire::SrvRecs" debug option and the option
"Acquire::EnableSrvRecods" to allow disabling this lookup.
|
|
Also support vertical tabs, as isspace() does the same.
Closes: #796067
|
|
|
|
|
|
feature/srv-records
|
|
Conflicts:
cmdline/apt-helper.cc
cmdline/makefile
|
|
This makes tests work again!
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: ignore
|
|
|
|
It still compiles after the change, so just merge it.
Closes: #448627
|
|
Not all terminals understand DOS' escape sequences for save/restore
cursor, so use the more typical sequences from terminfo.
Closes: #772521
Signed-off-by: James McCoy <jamessan@debian.org>
|
|
Also unify the case of considerFiles and ConsiderFiles to be
ConsiderFiles in all cases.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
Currently, this always returns true, but it might start returning
false at some point in the future...
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
|
|
This allows us to run the clang static analyzer and to run the
testsuite with the clang MemorySanitizer.
|
|
Closes: #762758
|
|
debian/experimental
|
|
|
|
More standardization
|
|
Switch to std::unique_ptr, as this is safer than SPtr.
|
|
This is nicer
|
|
This somehow got back, we don't really know why. Emulate the
Section() method in the PkgIterator by looking at the section
of the head of the VersionList.
|
|
Treat invalid pin priorities and overflows as an error.
Closes: #429912
|
|
If there is no candidate, the package should not be considered
upgradeable.
LP: #896689
|
|
This allows us to exclude files from being considered for the
priority, so it will return only specific-version matches.
|
|
Support for that variable was removed in dpkg in 1.15.6, in commit
6f037003e8b96878b485efb7cbd1f846e3bf4e97.
Closes: #765366
|
|
Thanks: Andre Felipe Machado for initial patch
Closes: 414848
|
|
Gbp-Dch: ignore
Reported-By: g++ -Wsuggest-override
Thanks: g++ -Wsuggest-override
|
|
This significantly reduces the number of files that have to be closed
and seems to be faster, despite the additional reads.
On systems where /proc/self/fd is not available, we fallback to the
old code that closes all file descriptors >= 3.
Closes: #764204
|
|
CurrentItem previously was a DescItem, so let's make QItem a
DescItem to not break things.
|
|
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
|
|
It complained about the previous code:
apt-pkg/sourcelist.cc: In destructor ‘pkgSourceList::~pkgSourceList()’:
apt-pkg/sourcelist.cc:278:4: warning: cannot optimize loop, the loop counter may overflow [-Wunsafe-loop-optimizations]
for (pkgIndexFile * const File : VolatileFiles)
^
There really cannot be an overflow, though. Rewriting it like this
seems to fix it.
|
|
This was broken in case all other sources were < 0.
|
|
This should fix travis compilation errors.
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
This makes test-bug-254770-segfault-if-cache-not-buildable happy.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
oldlibs used to be in APT::Never-MarkAuto-Sections so that old
transition packages can be removed without causing the then
(autoinstalled) renamed package to be autoremoved. It isn't ideal
through as ideally you want the oldlibs package to be removed after
nothing depends on it anymore regardless of if you have once installed
it by hand or not – and if you had the package talking over (the
dependencies) should carry the manual bit now as they are the real deal
now.
As an added bonus if the package has no dependencies because it is an
oldlibs without a direct replacement you should move away from (like
lib1 and lib2 are currently in the archive, but there will hopefully
only be lib2 in the release) you get a lib1 marked as auto.
If the user still needs the oldlibs package for some reason all he has
to do is mark it as manual once as this move is only performed if a
installed package changes its section from a not-Move-Autobit-Sections
to a Move-Autobit-Sections.
|