| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The rational from the buglog:
> The problem here is that the Priority field in one of the Packages files
> is incorrect due to a mishap with reprepro configuration, […] the
> amd64 version is Priority: standard but the arm64 version is Priority:
> optional (and has a stray "optional: interpreters" field).
> […]
> However, Priority is a rather weak property of a package because it's
> typically applied via overrides, and it's easy for maintainers of
> third-party repositories to misconfigure them so that overrides aren't
> applied correctly. It shouldn't be ranked ahead of choosing packages
> from the native architecture. In this case, I have no user-mode
> emulation for arm64 set up, so choosing m4:arm64 simply won't work.
This effectly makes the priority the least interesting data point in
chosing a provider, which is in line with the other checks we have
already order above priority in the past and also has a certain appeal by
the soft irony it provides.
Closes: #718482
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
debian/changelog
|
|
|
|
|
|
debug output of Debug::pkgDepCache::AutoInstall=true
|
|
|
|
GCC 4.8 is now clever enough to warn about:
contrib/sha2_internal.cc: In function ‘char* SHA256_End(SHA256_CTX*, char*)’:
contrib/sha2_internal.cc:656:31: warning: argument to ‘sizeof’ in ‘void*
memset(void*, int, size_t)’ call is the same expression as the destination;
did you mean to dereference it? [-Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess]
MEMSET_BZERO(context, sizeof(context));
So fix it as suggested. Its interesting though that the SHA2*
calculation as far as we need it works even without zeroing out.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
fixup for 42d51f333e8ef522fed02cdfc48663488d56c3a3
The for-loop iterating over the DepIterators which need configuration
can (and will be in 'complicated' situations) run multiple times, so we
can't just GlobOr on the DepIterator as it modifies it, so that the next
iteration over the list ends up checking another dependency leading us
into a 'Internal error, packages left unconfigured. foopkg' maybe or we
are 'lucky' and calculate a solution which might break down the line
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
With the selfgrown splitting we got the problem of not recovering
from networks which just reply with invalid data like those sending
us login pages to authenticate with the network (e.g. hotels) back.
The good thing about the InRelease file is that we know that it must
be clearsigned (a Release file might or might not have a detached sig)
so if we get a file but are unable to split it something is seriously
wrong, so there is not much point in trying further.
The Acquire system already looks out for a NODATA error from gpgv,
so this adds a new error message sent to the acquire system in case
the splitting we do now ourselves failed including this magic word.
Closes: #712486
|
|
Before we download the 'new' InRelease file the old file will be moved
out of the way with the name 'foobar_InRelease.reverify', so if no
partial file for the 'new' file exists take the modification time from
this reverify file, so that if we get an IMS hit for the InRelease file
we can move back the reverify file as new file rather than downloading
the 'new' file even though we already have it.
We do the same for Release files and this happened to work until the
reverify renaming was corrected for InRelease files.
|
|
|
|
do not blindly assume that all packages stanzas have a "Description:"
field in 'apt-cache show' as well as in the cache creation itself.
We instead assume now that if the stanza has a Description, it will not
be the first field as we look out for "\nDescription" to take care of
MD5sum as well as (maybe ignored) translated Descriptions embedded in
the package stanza.
Closes: #712435
|
|
We do the same in the acquire system which handles the 'normal'
downloads, so do it here as well even though its unlikely anyone
will ever notice (beside testcases of course …)
|
|
Testing for global PendingErrors in users of CopyFile is incorrect
in so far as unrelated errors will prevent us from copying perfectly
fine files and checking for the validity of the files is just better
in CopyFiles as it already checks if files are at least opened.
Add also a higher-level error message to the error stack if it fails.
|
|
OpenInternDescriptor failures would cause additional errors to be
generated by double-closing an fd. Other errors (although these
are generated if the method is used incorrectly, so unlikely)
didn't close the fd aswell.
Closes: 704608
|
|
Previously some errors would set the Fail flag while some didn't
without a clear reason as all errors leave a bad FileFd behind,
so we use a helper now to ensure that all errors set the flag.
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
In the past packages were flagged "Protected" so that install/
remove markings where issued before the ProblemResolver.
Nowadays, the marking methods check if they are allowed to modify
the marking of a package instead, so that markings set by FromUser
calls are not overwritten anymore by automatic calls which elimates
the need for InstallProtect which just eats CPU now.
The method itself is left untouched for now in case frontend needs it
still for some wierd usecase, but they should be eliminated.
|
|
Splits the big loop over dependencies in SmartConfigure which unpacks and
configures dependencies into two loops and reverse their order, so that all
dependencies which need to be unpacked are handled first and only after that
configures are issued for dependencies.
This is needed as otherwise the unpack of a (new) dependency will be issued
in between a configure call for two (or more) packages which form a loop,
which means the configure calls aren't part of the same dpkg call and
therefore dpkg bails out.
Such tight loops should really be avoided as they are usually wrong – and in
reality the dependencies in libreoffice were greatly simplified thanks to
Rene Engelhard so the problem is gone for the benefit of all.
Closes: 707578
|
|
|
|
Used to work until a certain (here unnamed) person came along and used
the wrong operator causing low-priority packages to be sorted above
high-priority packages while choosing a provider in commit
2b5c35c7bb915dbd46fefd7c79f05364ba22f93b from Nov 2011
|
|
Doing Removes early is good to have them out of the way, so they
don't break 'Inst' or 'Conf' chains, but scoring them above Essentials
means that we end up upgrading (many) less important packages before
we handle big stuff like libc6 or debconf which not only fails if those
less important packages have unannounced (strict) dependencies, but also
leads to having these packages unconfigured for a long time triggering
bugs in maintainer scripts for no good reason (#708831).
So this commits sets the default value for remove scores to 100, which
is below the one for essentials (200) and a lot lower than the previous
default value (500).
|
|
Some squeeze → wheezy upgrades indicate that DepRemove runs amok
in complicated setups as it wasn't correctly working with or-groups.
Completely rewritten the check is now moving from or-group to or-group
instead.
The behavior should be the same as the code before, but
(hopefully) with less bugs and more comments.
Closes: 645713
|
|
|
|
versions to fix partial upgrades (Closes: #707771)
The rename in 0.9.7.9~exp2 moved the method body to the class definition
which means it became inline, which isn't ABI compatibile. The reverse of
moving inline to non-inline is safe though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Do not propagate negative scores from rdepends. Propagating the absolute
value of a negative score may boost obsolete packages and keep them
installed instead of installing their successors. (Closes: #699759)
|
|
(closes: #705648)
|
|
|
|
translations. Closes: #705087
|
|
|
|
- fix segfault when a hostname contains a [, thanks to
Tzafrir Cohen (closes: #704653)
|
|
to save some space and allow quick comparisions later on
|
|
- provide DepIterator::IsSatisfied as a nicer shorthand for DepCheck
|
|
|
|
* apt-pkg/pkgcache.cc:
- assume sorted hashtable entries for groups/packages
|
|
|
|
|
|
so use this to try to reuse some version strings
|
|
- add a string-equal shortcut for equal version comparisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
free to escape all lines (we have no lines in our files which need
to be escaped as these would be invalid fieldnames) and while ExecGPGV
would detect dash-escaped text as invalid (as its not expected in
messages with detached signatures) it would be possible to "comment"
lines in (signed) dsc files which are only parsed but not verified
|
|
|
|
apt-pkg/deb/deblistparser.cc:
- use OpenMaybeClearSignedFile to be free from detecting and
skipping clearsigning metadata in dsc and Release files
We can't write a "clean" file to disk as not all acquire methods copy
Release files before checking them (e.g. cdrom), so this reverts recombining,
but uses the method we use for dsc files also in the two places we
deal with Release files
|
