Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Pu/patterns phase2
See merge request apt-team/apt!85
|
|
This avoids downgrade attacks where an attacker could inject
Location: http://private.example/
and then (having access to raw data to private.example, for example,
by opening a port there, or sniffing network traffic) read the credentials
for the private repository.
Closes: #945911
|
|
While passing the combi Release and Release.gpg to the gpgv method for
verification the filename of Release is placed where usually Release.gpg
is assumed in the rest of the code. The "usual" cases like passing
verification and failing verification ending in an error are taking care
of this, but the code path dealing with a failed verification, but
ignoring said failure (e.g. due to trusted=yes) was not which results in
the wrong file being removed later on (in case the index happens to be
unmodified since the last update call) leading us into the abyss of
strange failures (fixed in the previous commit) were nothing should have
changed.
This is not a security issue in this form as the repository needs to fail
verification & the user forcing apt to ignore the failure and carry on
anyhow. It does show however how complicated the code and its various
interconnected paths can become.
Reported-By: Val "pinkieval" Lorentz on IRC
|
|
If we have no old Release file, but old indices we can't compare
hashsums with the new Release file and hence must request the indices
again and have to react to IMS hits if they didn't change.
We used to symlink the old index file to the partial directory, but that
usually meant that we linked an uncompressed file to a compressed file,
which not all uncompressors can deal with transparently resulting in
strange failures.
We could do without the symlink, but that would require changes in the
codepaths dealing with failure as they would rename the file to FAILED.
|
|
Unused variable, std::algorithms instead of raw for-loops.
There should be no observeable difference in behaviour.
Reported-By: cppcheck
Gbp-Dch: Ignore
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is pure syntactic sugar - ?narrow does not exist in the
abstract syntax.
|
|
|
|
When using locale in which symbols occupy more than 1 byte (for example,
ru_RU.UTF-8), the progress bar width was calculated incorrectly because
std::string::size() returns the number of bytes rather than the number of
actual characters. Use the newly introduced APT::String::DisplayLength()
to calculate the width instead.
|
|
Returns string length, but unlike std::string::size() it honors
multibyte characters. This allows to properly calculate visible
sizes of console messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When multiple translations of package descriptions are available,
perform search in all of them. It allows using search patterns in
any of the configured languages.
Previously, only the first available translation was searched. As
the result, patterns in e.g. English never matched packages which
had their descriptions translated into local language.
Closes: #490000
|
|
Using --force-depends causes dpkg to continue removing packages
a package depends upon even if that package fails to be removed,
because dpkg turns off all sanity checks. So we gotta tell dpkg
to stop immediately if there's an error removing stuff.
Closes: #935910
LP: #1844634
|
|
This should probably make those functions thread-safe, which
might be useful for some external users.
|
|
Only disallow ,() and on the start of a word also ~ and ?. Make
sure to include \0 as disallowed.
|
|
|
|
This matches any package that does not have versions.
|
|
The ?exact-name pattern matches the name exactly, there is
no substring matching going on, or any regular expression
or fnmatch magic.
|
|
This matches all packages where at least one of the versions
is marked essential; or well, whenver apt considers a package
essential.
|
|
This matches all packages that have broken dependencies in the
installed version or the version selected for install.
|
|
These two are mutually exclusive states of installed-ness. And
?installed package is fully unpacked and configured; a ?config-files
package only has config files left.
|
|
These match packages that have no version in a repository, or
where an upgrade is available. Notably,
?and(?obsolete,?upgradable) == ?false
because an upgradable package is by definition not obsolete.
|
|
These patterns allow you to identify automatically installed
packages, as well as automatically installed packages that are
no longer reachable from the manually installed ones.
|
|
This implements the basic logic patterns:
?and ?false ?not ?or ?true
and the basic package patterns:
?architecture ?name ?x-name-fnmatch
|
|
This adds a transformation from parse tree into a CacheFilter and
connects it with cachesets and the apt list command.
|
|
Introduce a parser for patterns that generates a parse tree. The
language understood by the parser is:
pattern = '?'TERM
| '?'TERM '(' pattern (',' pattern)* ','? ')'
| WORD
| QUOTED-WORD
TERM = [0-9a-zA-Z-]
WORD = [0-9a-ZA-Z-.*^$\[\]_\\]
QUOTED_WORD = "..." # you know what I mean
This language is context free, which is a massive simplification
from aptitude's language, where ?foo(bar) could have two different
meanings depending on whether ?foo takes an argument or not.
|
|
In commit 79b1a8298, QueueName() was changed, amongst other things,
to exit early when the queue mode was single access, as single
access does not need any fancy queue name. The exit became too
early though, as Config was not initialized anymore, but the
caller was relying on it.
Fix QueueName() to always initialize Config and in Enqueue()
initialize Config with a nullptr, so if this regresses it's
guaranteed to fail harder. Also add a test case - this is
very simple, but the first and only test case for access
queue mode.
Regression-Of: 79b1a82983e737e74359bc306d9edb357c5bdd46
LP: #1839714
|
|
Improve locking messaging - pid and name, "do not remove lock file"
See merge request apt-team/apt!68
|
|
Also in old changelogs, but nothing really user visible
like error messages or alike so barely noteworthy.
Reported-By: codespell
Gbp-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Reported-By: cppcheck
|
|
The error messages say only which package it was trying to provide, but
not which package & version tried it which can be misleading as to which
package (version) is the offender.
References: #930256
|
|
Work like applying patches via rred can be performed by many concurrent
rred processes, but we can't just spawn new ones forever: We limit us to
the number of CPUs which can drive them and reuse existing ones if they
have nothing to do at the moment.
The problem arises if we have reached the limit of queues and all of
them are busy which is more likely to happen on "slow" machines with few
CPUs. In this case we opted for random distribution, but that can result
in many big files (e.g. Contents) being added to one queue while the
others get none or only small files.
Ideally we would ask the methods how much they still have to do, but
they only know that for the current item, not for all items in the
queue, so we use the filesize of the expected result.
|
|
We want to tell users which process is holding the lock so they
can easily understand what's going on, and we want to advise
users not to remove the lock file, because ugh, that's bad.
Re-initalize the flock structure, in case it got mangled by
previous fcntl call.
|
|
We are converting to std::string anyway by passing to
istringstream, and this removes the need for .c_str()
in callers.
|
|
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
These functions do not produce any useful results anymore, so
it's pointless to keep them around.
|
|
This mostly turns them private and then overrides the public
version with the switch, as recommended.
|
|
1.6 was 13, so 1.7 has 14 reserved, and 1.8 has 15 reserved, so
let's use 16 for 1.9 for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LP: #1756595
Fixes Debian/apt#94
|
|
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|