| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It's a tiny diff, so why not? But no need to document it.
Closes: #787846
|
|
Before MultiArch implicits weren't a thing, so they were hidden by
default by definition. Adding them for MultiArch solved many problems,
but having no reliable way of detecting which dependency (and provides)
is implicit or not causes problems everytime we want to output
dependencies without confusing our observers with unneeded
implementation details.
The really notworthy point here is actually that we keep now a better
record of how a dependency came to be so that we can later reason about
it more easily, but that is hidden so deep down in the library internals
that change is more the problems it solves than the change itself.
|
|
'files' is a bit too generic as a name for a command usually only used
programmatically (if at all) by developers, so instead of "wasting" this
generic name for this we use "indextargets" which is actually the name
of the datastructure the displayed data is stored in.
Along with this rename the config options are renamed accordingly.
|
|
Selecting targets based on the Release they belong to isn't to
unrealistic. In fact, it is assumed to be the most used case so it is
made the default especially as this allows to bundle another thing we
have to be careful with: Filenames and only showing targets we have
acquired.
Closes: 752702
|
|
Downloading additional files is only half the job. We still need a way
to allow external tools to know where the files are they requested for
download given that we don't want them to choose their own location.
'apt-get files' is our answer to this showing by default in a deb822
format information about each IndexTarget with the potential to filter
the records based on lines and an option to change the output format.
The command serves also as an example on how to get to this information
via libapt.
|
|
You would think one instance of this is enough, but
80e8d923ebc8d5f3f84eb3f922b28ca309c25026 wasn't as
globally applied as the commit message suggested…
LP: #1399037
|
|
By convention, if I run a tool with --help or --version I expect it to
exit successfully with the usage, while if I do call it wrong (like
without any parameters) I expect the usage message shown with a non-zero
exit.
|
|
The conversion to accept only relevant options for commands has
forgotten another one, so adding it again even through the usecase might
very well be equally good served by --print-uris.
Closes: 742578
|
|
The configuration key Acquire::AllowInsecureRepositories controls if
apt allows loading of unsigned repositories at all.
The configuration Acquire::AllowDowngradeToInsecureRepositories
controls if a signed repository can ever become unsigned. This
should really never be needed but we provide it to avoid having
to mess around in /var/lib/apt/lists if there is a use-case for
this (which I can't think of right now).
|
|
apt-cache search supported this since ever and in the code for apt was a
fixme indicating this should be added here as well, so here we go.
|
|
dist-upgrade is supposed to be an alias for full-upgrade in apt, but
dist-upgrade was the only command recognized of the two in the option
and flags recognition code.
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
Reported-By: gcc -Wsuggest-attribute={pure,const,noreturn}
|
|
Beside being a bit cleaner it hopefully also resolves oddball problems
I have with high levels of parallel jobs.
Git-Dch: Ignore
Reported-By: iwyu (include-what-you-use)
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
Reported-By: gcc -Wmissing-declarations
|
|
Inspired by the rest of the patch in 661537, but abstract the
parsing of various ways of setting the build profiles more so it can
potentially be reused and all apt parts have the same behaviour.
Especially config options, cmdline options and environment will not be
combined as proposed as this isn't APTs usual behaviour and dpkg doesn't
do it either, so one overrides the other as it normally does.
|
|
debian/experimental-no-abi-break
Conflicts:
apt-private/private-cmndline.cc
|
|
There is a new "apt full-upgrade" that performs a apt-get dist-upgrade.
"apt dist-upgrade" is still supported as a alias. The "apt upgrade" code
is changed so that it mirrors the behavior of
"apt-get upgrade --with-new-pkgs" and also honors
"apt uprade --no-new-pkgs".
|
|
Display only the candidate version with "apt show pkg" but show
a notice that there is more to see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
apt-private/private-cmndline.cc
|
|
|
|
cross-building (LP: #1255806)
|
|
|
|
-> APT::Cmd::Use-Regexp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#722324)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The --with-allow-new option maps to APT::Get::UpgradeAllowNew and
will allow "apt-get upgrade" to install new packages (but not to
delete existing packages)
|
|
|
|
experimental
|
