apt.git - Saurik's version of apt managed for tvOS/ARM64

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2015-01-10	award points for positive dependencies again	David Kalnischkies
	Commit 9ec748ff103840c4c65471ca00d3b72984131ce4 from Feb 23 last year adds a version check after 8daf68e366fa9fa2794ae667f51562663856237c added 8 days earlier negative points for breaks/conflicts with the intended that only dependencies which are satisfied propagate points (aka: old conflicts do not). The implementation was needlessly complex and flawed through preventing positive dependencies from gaining points like they did before these commits making library transitions harder instead of simpler. It worked out anyhow most of the time out of pure 'luck' (and other ways of gaining points) or got miss attributed to being a temporary hick-up. Closes: 774924
2014-03-13	check version before adding scores in resolver	David Kalnischkies
	Prevents that "old" dependencies have an influence in the scoring. With positive dependencies this is usually not a problem, but negative dependencies can linger around for a long time.
2014-03-13	propagate a negative score point along breaks/conflicts	David Kalnischkies
	versioned -dev packages like db and boost have the problem of no dependencies which would give them a competitive advantage against an older incarnation of the -dev package, so they tend to be kept back until the old version is removed from the archive, which, if the user has older releases in its sources can take a long time (or never happens). The newer version has a conflicts/breaks against the older one, but the older one hasn't against the newer, so by giving via the conflicts the older one a reduced score the newer one can win if there is no other reason to keep it. If both have a conflict against each other the scoring will cancel itself out, so no harm done. This gives "action" a slightly bigger edge in breaks/conflicts cases than before, but holding back isn't a really good solution anyway.