| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In commit a221efc331693f8905da870141756c892911c433 I promoted the source
package name and version to the binary cache for faster access by e.g.
EDSP, but due to changing the interpretation length to soon we always
ignored the version part of the Source field, so that packages ended up
having the binary version as source version – which while usually just
fine it is wrong for binary rebuilds.
Closes: 812492
|
|
This doesn't allow all tests to run cleanly, but it at least allows to
write tests which could run successfully in such environments.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
The relevant testcases are in test/integration/test-apt-get-source.
There is a test for #731853 that is supposed to "ensure that apt will
pick the higher version number" of 0.0.1 (stable) and 0.1 (stable).
However, this works by pure chance, as simply reversing the order
of the two insertsource lines makes the test fail.
So #731853 isn't really fixed, yet.
Actually, that's related to the problem I reported, as the underlying
issue for both is the same:
In the FindSrc function apt chooses a new 'best hit', if either
* there is a target release and it matches the release of the package,
* or the version of the package is higher than the last best hit.
Consider having 1.0 (stable), 2.0 (unstable) and 1.5 (unstable),
in this order.
Looking for the version in stable, apt first selects 1.0, because the
release matches the target release, but then subsequently selects 2.0,
because the version is higher.
Looking for the version in unstable, apt first selects 2.0, because the
release matches the target release, but then subsequently selects 1.5,
because the release also matches the target release.
The correct way would be to choose a new 'best hit', if either
* there is a target release and it matches the release of the package,
* or there is no target release
and the version is higher than the last best hit.
Closes: 746412
Mail-Reference: <565A604B.7090104@googlemail.com>
Mail-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/11/msg00470.html
|
|
A bit unfair that only Bzr had this message. Lets at least print it for
git as well with the option of adding more later without string changes.
|
|
The md5sum hash is broken since some time and we should no longer
consider it a usable hash. Also update the tests to reflect this.
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
It shouldn't be too common, but sometimes people have multiple mirrors
in the sources or otherwise repositories with the same content. Now that
we gracefully can handle multiple requests to the same URI, we can also
fold multiple requests with the same expected hashes into one. Note that
this isn't trying to find oppertunities for merging, but just merges if
it happens to encounter the oppertunity for it.
This is most obvious in the new testcase actually as it needs to delay
the action to give the acquire system enough time to figure out that
they can be merged.
|
|
We use test{success,failure} now all over the place in the framework, so
its only consequencial to do this in the situations in which we test for
a specific output as well.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
The conversion to accept only relevant options for commands has
forgotten another one, so adding it again even through the usecase might
very well be equally good served by --print-uris.
Closes: 742578
|
|
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
message instead of "ignoring"
|
|
pkg=version requests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
write out the selection notice to c1out to be consistent with the rest of the source
|
|
|
