| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
configure.ac
debian/changelog
|
|
|
|
|
|
'mvo/bugfix/apt-get-source-unauthenticated-warning' into debian/sid
|
|
|
|
Closes: 742835
|
|
In commit 21b3eac8 I promoted the check for installable dependencies to
a pre-install check, which also reverts to a known good candidate (the
installed version) if it fails. This revert was done even for user
requested candidate switches which disabled our Broken detection so that
install requests which are impossible to satisfy do not fail anymore,
but print an (incomplete) solution proposal and then exit successfully.
Closes: 745046
|
|
|
|
This will show the same unauthenticated warning for source packages
as for binary packages and will not download a source package if
it is unauthenticated. This can be overridden with
--allow-unauthenticated
Closes: #749795
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Adds also a small testcase for EDSP
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
dpkg on Ubuntu 12.04 does not seem to support parsing arch-specific
dependencies, so we try to detect if we face such a dpkg in the test.
In the other test the order depends on libdb, which changes per arch, so
we just run it through our sorting binary and be happy (hopefully).
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
As outlined in #748355 apt segfaulted if it encountered a loop between a
package pre-depending on a package conflicting with the previous as it
ended up in an endless loop trying to unpack 'the other package'.
In this specific case as an essential package is involved a lot of force
needs to be applied, but can also be caused by 'normal' tight loops and
highlights a problem in how we handle breaks which we want to avoid.
The fix comes in multiple entangled changes:
1. All Smart* calls are guarded with loop detection. Some already had it,
some had parts of it, some did it incorrect, and some didn't even try.
2. temporary removes to avoid a loop (which is done if a loop is
detected) prevent the unpack of this looping package (we tried to unpack
it to avoid the conflict/breaks, but due to a loop we couldn't, so we
remove/deconfigure it instead which means we can't unpack it now)
3. handle conflicts and breaks very similar instead of duplicating most
of the code. The only remaining difference is, as it should:
deconfigure is enough for breaks, for conflicts we need the big hammer
|
|
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Closes: 748389
|
|
In bugreport #747261 I confirmed with this testcase that apt actually
supports the requested architecture-specific conflicts already since
2012 with commit cef094c2ec8214b2783a2ac3aa70cf835381eae1.
The old test only does simulations which are handy to check apt,
this one builds 'real' packages to see if dpkg agrees with us.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
|
Version/Architecture information in a Translation-$lang file is
not allowed, so don't try to parse it. This is a fix for a bugreport
where a Translation-en file contained the content of the regular
Packages file (probably due to local FS corruption). This lead to
strange error messages on file download.
Thanks to Thomas Reusch for the report.
|
|
|
|
debian/sid
|
|
Conflicts:
configure.ac
debian/apt.dirs
debian/changelog
|
|
Closes: 746434
|
|
Conflicts:
po/vi.po
|
|
The bugreport highlights the problem with an empty package name. We fix
this by 'ignoring' these so that it behaves just like "apt-get install".
The deeper problem is that modifier strings can be longer than a package
name in which case the comparison doesn't make sense, so don't compare
then. Was not noticed so far as all modifiers are of length 1, so the
only package name shorter than this is in fact the empty package name.
Closes: 744940
|
|
Conflicts:
debian/changelog
|
|
Conflicts:
test/integration/test-apt-cli-list
|
|
|
|
A package which can't be downloaded anymore is very likely dropped from
a release and can therefore no longer be 'standard' (or similar). We
therefore do not grant points for them anymore and demote them to
prio:extra instead which helps other packages breaking them away even if
they have a lower priority.
The testcase was initially created by Michael Vogt and just amended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the user is using "apt list pattern" and there is only a single
hit, notice about "--all-versions" as this is what the user may
be interessted in
|
|
This patch should fix spurious test failures in jenkins or travis
that are caused by a race condition in the {stunnel,aptwebserver}.pid
file creation
|
|
Packages in the "deinstall ok config-file" have no candidate or
instaleld version. So they must be special cased in the apt list
generation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
apt-pkg/deb/dpkgpm.cc
debian/apt.auto-removal.sh
debian/changelog
vendor/debian/sources.list.in
|
|
|
|
Use mkstemp() in apt-extractemplates and add a integrationtest
for apt-extracttemplates too. Thanks to Steve Kemp for the report.
|
|
In commit 446551c8 I changed MarkInstall to discard the candidate if the
candidate can't satisfy the dependency. This breaks interactive solvers
like aptitude which can change the candidate on-the-fly later.
In commit df77d8a5 I introduced this 'early' loop-breaking to begin with
which can't be that helpful for interactive solvers as well, but makes
perfect sense for non-interactives to stop them from exploring trees
which can't be satisfied, but it isn't perfect as ideally we would check
this before auto-installing the first dependency.
This commit therefore moves the loop into its own IsInstallOk hook so
that frontends can override this check if they want to and in exchange
removes the loop-breaking from MarkInstall itself and does it before any
dependency is installed.
Closes: 740750
|
