apt.git - Saurik's version of apt managed for tvOS/ARM64

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2015-11-27	outsmart gcc -O3 over-optimization in pkgCdrom::FindPackages	David Kalnischkies
	Seems like a simpler workaround than forcing a lower optimization level just for this for all of apt. See also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-5/+bug/1473674
2015-11-04	support arch:all data e.g. in separate Packages file	David Kalnischkies
	Based on a discussion with Niels Thykier who asked for Contents-all this implements apt trying for all architecture dependent files to get a file for the architecture all, which is treated internally now as an official architecture which is always around (like native). This way arch:all data can be shared instead of duplicated for each architecture requiring the user to download the same information again and again. There is one problem however: In Debian there is already a binary-all/ Packages file, but the binary-any files still include arch:all packages, so that downloading this file now would be a waste of time, bandwidth and diskspace. We therefore need a way to decide if it makes sense to download the all file for Packages in Debian or not. The obvious answer would be a special flag in the Release file indicating this, which would need to default to 'no' and every reasonable repository would override it to 'yes' in a few years time, but the flag would be there "forever". Looking closer at a Release file we see the field "Architectures", which doesn't include 'all' at the moment. With the idea outlined above that 'all' is a "proper" architecture now, we interpret this field as being authoritative in declaring which architectures are supported by this repository. If it says 'all', apt will try to get all, if not it will be skipped. This gives us another interesting feature: If I configure a source to download armel and mips, but it declares it supports only armel apt will now print a notice saying as much. Previously this was a very cryptic failure. If on the other hand the repository supports mips, too, but for some reason doesn't ship mips packages at the moment, this 'missing' file is silently ignored (= that is the same as the repository including an empty file). The Architectures field isn't mandatory through, so if it isn't there, we assume that every architecture is supported by this repository, which skips the arch:all if not listed in the release file.
2014-04-16	use Google C++ Testing Framework for libapt tests	David Kalnischkies
	My commit 45df0ad2 from 26. Nov 2009 had a little remark: "The commit also includes a very very simple testapp." This was never intended to be permanent, but as usually… The commit adds the needed make magic to compile gtest statically as it is required and links it against a small runner. All previous testcase binaries are reimplemented in gtest and combined in this runner. While most code is a 1:1 translation some had to be rewritten like compareversion_test.cc, but the coverage remains the same.
2014-03-13	cleanup headers and especially #includes everywhere	David Kalnischkies
	Beside being a bit cleaner it hopefully also resolves oddball problems I have with high levels of parallel jobs. Git-Dch: Ignore Reported-By: iwyu (include-what-you-use)
2011-12-11	add a testcase for FindPackages() to better validate that cdrom should work.	David Kalnischkies
	Unfortunately it's hard to do an automated integration test with cd, so we test this method in isolation which tries to find Indexes and dropping of duplications with DropRepeats()