summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/integration/test-apt-get-autoremove
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-12-03Provide a "autopurge" shortcutJulian Andres Klode
This adds a new "autopurge" command that will is a shortcut for "autoremove --purge" Thanks: Michael Vogt for the initial work
2018-05-21Extend test-apt-get-autoremove to check debug outputFilipe Brandenburger
Run `apt-get autoremove -o Debug::pkgAutoRemove=yes` and confirm the logged reason for packages to be kept is correct. Only check for specific debug lines containing 'MarkPackage:' in order to prevent new debug logging to break the test case.
2017-03-19Ignore AutomaticRemove conffile option in upgradeDavid Kalnischkies
We are in a dilemma here: The regression of sorts was introduced in 2013 with commit d8a8f9d7f0 allowing pkg modifiers for the upgrade commands. That calls the autoremover as a sideeffect through and with it comes the option to remove the garbage packages in these commands (similar to aptitude). Having the option on the commandline is no problem – people aren't going to request what they don't want (or so I hope), but the documentation explicitly states that this option only effects install/remove and mentions a config knob users might use and expect to not suddenly apply (especially without documentation) to more commands. Just reverting the commit is out of question, completely ignoring the option breaks the workflow of every user who happened to use --autoremove on the commandline for upgrade and expects that to work given that it was accepted and worked in a stable release. Changing the documentation to reflect reality while perhaps the simplest and cleanest option contradicts freeze and is a surprising change we tend to avoid like the plague while just leaving it be confuses all users who end up believing the documentation even if was different in the last 3 years. So what we do is a tricky compromise: The configuration option if read from a file does apply only for install/remove as documented, while if the option is encountered on the commandline it is accepted and applies to the upgrade which should make 99% of the users happy. The rest has to wait for us to figure out for buster how to get that documented and implemented in a saner way. Closes: #855891
2016-08-24do not restore selections for already purged packagesDavid Kalnischkies
In most cases apt was already skipping the (re)setting of packages as to be removed/purged if dpkg had told us that it already did, but we haven't dealt with it in the most obvious of the cases: Selections set for packages we touched in this operation which either restores selections even dpkg would have overridden or e.g. tries to restore a purge selection for a package which was just purged – does not happen with apt itself as it isn't using selections in this way, but higher frontends like aptitude do. The result in the later case is a warning printed by dpkg that we try to set selections for an unknown package, which is harmless per se, but can be confusing for users and we really shouldn't cause warnings in dpkg if we can help it. Reported-By: Guillem Jover on IRC
2016-08-10save and restore selection states before/after calling dpkgDavid Kalnischkies
dpkg decides certain things on its own based on selections and especially if we want to call --pending on purge/remove actions, we need to ensure a clean slate or otherwise we surprise the user by removing packages we weren't allowed to remove by the user in this run (the selection might be an overarching plan for the not-yet "future"). Ideally dpkg would have some kind of temporal selection interface for this case, but it hasn't, so we make it temporal with the risk of loosing state if we don't manage to restore them.
2016-07-01protect only the latest same-source providers from autoremoveDavid Kalnischkies
Traditionally all providers are protected providing something as apt can't know which of them is actually really providing the functionality for the user ensuring that we don't propose the removal of used stuff, but that is of course also keeping stuff around which could be removed. That can cause the collection of multiple old providers until the provided package is itself no longer needed (e.g. out-of-tree kernel modules). We combat this by marking providers only from the newest source package version so that old providers built by older versions of the same source package can be garbage collected.
2016-01-25fix tests run via sudo checking the history fileDavid Kalnischkies
Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-12-19tests: support spaces in path and TMPDIRDavid Kalnischkies
This doesn't allow all tests to run cleanly, but it at least allows to write tests which could run successfully in such environments. Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-11-04suggest 'apt autoremove' to get right of unneeded packagesDavid Kalnischkies
The bugreport is more conservative in asking for a conditional, but given that this is a message intended to be read by users to be run by users we should suggest using a command intended to be used by users. And while we are at, add sudo to the message – conditional of course. Closes: 801571
2015-09-14do not discard new manual-bits while applying EDSP solutionsDavid Kalnischkies
In private-install.cc we call MarkInstall with FromUser=true, which sets the bit accordingly, but while applying the EDSP solution we call mark install on all packages with FromUser=false, so MarkInstall believes this install is an automatic one and sets it to auto – so that a new package which is explicitely installed via an external solver is marked as auto and is hence also up for garbage collection in a following call. Ideally MarkInstall wouldn't reset it, but the detection is hard to do without regressing in other cases – and ideally ideally MarkInstall wouldn't deal with the autobit at all – so we work around this on the calling side for now.
2015-08-10implement a more generic ShowList methodDavid Kalnischkies
apt-get is displaying various lists of package names, which until now it was building as a string before passing it to ShowList, which inserted linebreaks at fitting points and showed a title if needed, but it never really understood what it was working with. With the help of C++11 the new generic knows not only what it works with, but generates the list on the fly rather than asking for it and potentially discarding parts of the input (= the non-default verbose display). It also doubles as a test for how usable the CacheSets are with C++11. (Not all callers are adapted yet.) Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-03-16test exitcode as well as string equalityDavid Kalnischkies
We use test{success,failure} now all over the place in the framework, so its only consequencial to do this in the situations in which we test for a specific output as well. Git-Dch: Ignore
2014-02-10fix remaining testcase-bugs from my armel boxDavid Kalnischkies
Git-Dch: Ignore
2013-10-01don't consider holds for autoremovalDavid Kalnischkies
We can't remove packages which are held back by the user with a hold, so marking them (or its dependencies) as garbage will lead our autoremover into madness – and given that the package is important enough that the user has held it back it can't be garbage (at least at the moment), so even if a front-end wants to use the info just for information display its a good idea to not consider it garbage for them. Closes: 724995
2013-08-12add chronic-like testsuccess/testfailure helpersDavid Kalnischkies
For many commands the output isn't stable (like then dpkg is called) but the exitcode is, so this helper enhances the common && msgpass || msgfail by generating automatically a msgtest and showing the output of the command in case of failure instead of discarding it unconditionally, the later being chronic-like behaviour Git-Dch: Ignore
2011-02-10use apt-mark instead of hand-mangling with the extended_states fileDavid Kalnischkies
2011-02-07rename changelog and autoremove testfile to indicate better what is testedDavid Kalnischkies