summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/integration/test-bug-618848-always-respect-user-requests
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-07-02Filter out impossible solutions for protected propagationDavid Kalnischkies
If the package providing the given solution is tagged already for removal (or at least for "not installing") we can ignore this solution as a possibility as it is not one, which means we can avoid exploring the option and potentially forward the protected flag further if that helps in reducing the possibilities to a single one.
2020-06-03Deal with duplicates in the solution space of a depDavid Kalnischkies
While we process the possible solutions we might modify other solutions like discarding their candidates and such, so that then we reach them they might no longer be proper candidates. We also try to drop duplicates early on to avoid the simple cases of these which test-explore-or-groups-in-markinstall triggers via its explicit duplication but could also come via multiple provides. It only worked previously as were ignoring current versions which usually is okay expect if they are marked for removal and we want to reinstate them so the ProblemResolver can decide which one later on.
2020-05-18Keep going if a dep is bad for user requests to improve errorsDavid Kalnischkies
We exit early from installing dependencies of a package only if it is not a user request to avoid polluting the state with installs which might not be needed (or detrimental even) for alternative choices. We do continue with installing dependencies though if it is a user request as it will improve error reporting for apt and can even help aptitude not hang itself so much as we trim the problem space down for its resolver dealing with all the easy things. Similar things can be said about the testcase I have short-circuit previously… keep going test, do what you should do to report errors!
2020-04-27Prefer upgrading installed orgroup membersDavid Kalnischkies
In normal upgrade scenarios this is no problem as the orgroup member will be marked for upgrade already, but on a not fully upgraded system (or while you operate on a different target release) we would go with our usual "first come first serve" approach which might lead us to install another provider who comes earlier – bad if the providers conflict.
2020-04-27Discard candidate if its dependencies can't be satisfiedDavid Kalnischkies
We do pretty much the same in IsInstallOk, but here we have already set the state, so we have to unroll the state as well to sort-of replicate the state we were in before this MarkInstall failed.
2016-05-01show StateCache flags in Pkg debug prettyprintDavid Kalnischkies
This basically introduces ~33 flags in the output, but a package can have only ~11 of them displayed at the same time. There is quiet a bit of duplication also (an uninstalled package is by definition a newinstall if its getting installed), but as this is debug output we are better of showing them all in case one of them isn't set in a way it is supposed to be set. Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-12-19tests: support spaces in path and TMPDIRDavid Kalnischkies
This doesn't allow all tests to run cleanly, but it at least allows to write tests which could run successfully in such environments. Git-Dch: Ignore
2015-03-16test exitcode as well as string equalityDavid Kalnischkies
We use test{success,failure} now all over the place in the framework, so its only consequencial to do this in the situations in which we test for a specific output as well. Git-Dch: Ignore
2012-11-09* cmdline/apt-get.cc:David Kalnischkies
- do not call Mark{Install,Delete} from the autoremove code with the FromUser bit set to avoid modifying the auto-installed bit
2011-03-26do not change protected packages in autoinstall (Closes: #618848)David Kalnischkies